Search results

Heres the facts for one last time: 1. You brought the car to us, it made 155bhp 2. We increased it to 182bhp, and improved torque and driveability as proven by the dyno printout that was presented before dispute, hence UNLIKELY to have been docotored as Nick now puports. 3. You paid, and took...

Every DD prinoujt has a checksum with DD can verify relates to the graph and data produced. Its right there on the printout, ah thats me covered then... next pointless argumentative point..

What does he not need to rpove, Im confused. I have graphs, a customer who took the vehicle away without marking as under dispute. And waiting a couple of months and reverting the car such that an independant inspection is not viable. Please do take me to court, like I said, it will be nothing...

And do most rollers take pics showing the actual car producing the actual graph? The whole cio community look at the clio cup cars that we have built ans tuned that win races, not forums....

Fubard??, did you see the graph? An improvement in Torque accross the rev range, and more power? I don't have time for spell check, I am actually sending emails and other stuff in between all this...

Are you serious? Evidence now? This was done before the discpute, its in earlier postings. If wanted to FAKE a graph, why would I not FAKE the 200bhp he wanted. Theres my evidnce, his is 'his mates car is quicker'. If you cannot see the corner I am standing then I really am wasting my time!

R46, yes forgive my naivity, I have not needed to attend court before....

Nick paid for the following, I ask EVERYONE, is this a bad result? Simple yes/no will suffice... Regards

I too would be taking myself to court if I had done what Nick has proclaimed. Fact is, the dyno prbvoes the positive results, our posts here show us trying to imroove it further. He has taken the vehcile away, the vehicle is now in a state decided upon by HIM not by US, hence no action can be...

So you are saying it does not take a technically minded person to redesign the MS system into a more power one, and intregrate it into production. You reliase Omex is a rebaged GEMs system dont you? And out of spite, how did you figure that one out?

How have I come accross dense? I came here trying to help Nick, only to have all of this in return. The usual 'forum bandwagon' effect has gone from my favour in earlier posts to Nicks way of thinking that, and this is simply put: The 30bhp you gave me, I am not happy with. Lunacy,

lol now your dsasying we faked a graph, yet have always had an honest reputaiot,n why would we not of faked the 200bhp you wanted??.. moron. Luckily you dont have a ford, I dont think the type of car determines your intelligence, I have been known to drive a clio, I didnt enoy it, but...

Seems you're a nice chap to know..... I hope Nick, takes your advice, you're obviosuly either a very good solicitor, or an idiot...

Wheres theres a claim, theres a you, my friend. The court will go: M-Tech made an imprvoement as shown by this dyno pronout, you paid the bill wtihout indicating under disput, you removed the vehicle. M-Tech have offered to help with the evidence providied by these forums postings blabla bla...

lol cant wait, however nick has beenb laughed off of the PF forums. We have the dyno graphs showing the improvements we made, and customer testimonials, I love it!

Your the one trying to put accross some other fallacy about illegally selling V3s, which we dont. Pathetic. Have a good day either way, home time for me im afraid!

PS I suggest you stop trying to slander us or I will be taking legal action, as we have done everything within our power to deliver, we added 30bhp and you took the car away apparently happy, only to carry on like this.

Oh no! Did Nick get put in his place??? http://passionford.com/forum/general-discussion/361386-m-tech-automotive-illegaly-selling-megasquirt-steer-clear.html

Few sync-losses no doubt! The best I have seen is when you alter TPS the coolant/air temp change as well, nice grounding there lol

Read the posts... thats the V3, pray tell what is fitted to yours, oh a V4 designed on our behalf by a company in southampton. You paid £2000 for a 30bhp increase on an engine with cam timing out, pretty good in my book, then again, I have a IQ level... If you had a problem you should of...

Ah yes indeed, but in motorsport you generally are running complete looms, terminal to terminal, hence they are crimped (and yes we have the £450 tool to crimp properly! lol) When joining wires to an exisitng loom in a road car though, soldered conenctions, which are then heatshrunk with the...

To clarify: The V4 is our own system, pehaps the chaps callin g everyone 'pricks' etc could open the case and note what is PRINTED onto the ecu silk screen. (M-Tech) Does Redux call itself Linus. After all the effort we put in to help above and beyond... as so many people were previously...

it supposidly got 155bhp when it went in there with cam timing out ?? which i think was rubbish as they had a 182 in a few weeks before prior to my car that got the same results or there abouts , it came out of there with 150bhp so lost 5bhp on the rollers i think We did email you the...

Nick, Very intersting. We gained 30bhp on your car end of. We are cowboys???!! The mazda is OURS. The 350Z has been here 2 months and a crate motor is on the way from the states. How have you seen it here years??We onyl moved to this new building in febuary! We build competition proven...

Hmm, indeed, in thatc ase the problem must lie elsewhere. Its mapped as presented, and like Nicmk said hes wanting to use the ECU and bodies on his next project, so not really a problem, just be interesting to know what caused the issues in the first place :)

We always check plugs when mapping just for colour. AFR is all well and good, but you can never beat the good old acide tests. Also, theyb were removed countless times when checking TDC for cam timing, leak don testing and so on, and no noticible issues. The car wa smapped as pressnted, wo...

Nick, Not a problem mate, I think we've all just been unlucky witht his clio! Bring on the boost :) Matt

Danny, Even after mapping againl, its till down 20bhp. Like I said to nick, im not saying you/me etc anyone has done anything wrong, just the changes made have lost it power. I am intrieged...

Icarus, Cheers for the info, the car has now left us. We originally saw a 30bhp gain. The injectors are paired and also only running crank sync, simultaneuos (can run seq and alkternating if needed) , 90* injection. Tried playing with a few bitsd and bos to njo effect. Matt

Chaps, Been maniclly busy :) Anyway, the car gained 30bhp before the cam timing was setup.. so Danny, must be mapping? Hmm I think not. Imo there is something wrong with cam timing, simple. It made 183bhp then the cam timing was changed and it lost 20bhp. 185bhp - SOMETHING CHANGES (ie cam...