Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
The end of the threads is there to lock the threads in place. The small section between the two threaded ends)
Hence why increasing the torque will make it more difficult to come undone
10 points to chip
Let's say I've taken the initial thread to 50Nm
Whilst torquing to 100Nm the second part will stretch until 50Nm is achieved,
Then the whole stud will stretch evenly to 100Nm
All whilst remaining within its elastic limits
fraser. false call pal
Chip has basically just emphasised what I said
not having enough torque on the studs when initially put into the hub will increase the chances of them coming off with the nut
He obviously didn't read the part where I said "it will all be at 100nm by the time it is...
if you increase the torque applied to the stud when you put it in a combination of the increased torque and the locktite will make it harder to come out.
That's just common sense.
I fully understand that torqueing the nut is what holds the wheel onto the car
The point that 'm getting at is...
both frasers and stuarts were set before being taken onto the track.
the thermal expansion In the hub has probably been enough to allow the studs to come loose
as I've said, tightening them to 20nm is not enough hence why yours have came loose
Also why stus have came loose twice
At the end of the day as long as I don't take it above the original specified torque values for the car then no harm has been done.
it will all be at 100nm by the time it is...
im running the pms kit and I've not had any issues so far!
my only recommendation would be to tighten the studs into the hubs without the use of a torque wrench.
I just don't think 20nm is enough tbh
I used an allen key and just done them up tight with that.
fraser when ive got the brake bleeder home from work we can just do both cars.
It sucks the fluid through from the bleed nipple so it should be a relatively clean and quick job :)
superblue seems like a good option
however i'm an arsepiece. Castrol SRF requires testing north of the border I feel.
Shall order some up at the tail end of next week and get it fired in.
We've got a new brake bleeder at work so I can test that out too! LOL :D
I do use the car on track, the Halfords stuff seems to not be lasting to well. bled the brakes a few times and I get a soft pedal half way through sessions
I'm runnin Carbon lorrainnes so I know its not the pads lol
Currently I believe my car has halfrauds dot 5.1 in it
Im looking to drain the fluids and replace them with something a bit better.
What do people recommend:
1: for someone on a budget
2: someone who isn't on a budget
im actually unsure.
i was at xtreme in broxburn and it made 200 which is unrealistic,
swr put it on a different set of rollers and i made 191 but i don't believe that either.
I'm thinking i must be around 180,
hopefully i can get it onto the rollers soon and get a figure
I've got 438's all be it i had a pretty weak engine in the car
also got a v6 airbox, matched inlets and a de-cat
need to get in on the rollers again as i'm running a different engine with the same mods :)
also need to get up to crail
it'd have to be done the same as the sunflower register.
get everyone with an iceberg to state the date that it was first registered.
never going to happen on here, there will be so many missing now
if you get the engine supported and remove the upper engine mount look down into the hole
there is a 17mm (i think) bolt
take that out and the big stupid weight will be removed (sitting below and infront of the mount)