Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Wouldn't bother with changing the oil, as you'll only have to change it when you want to use it again. Personally wouldn't bother with a car cover, unless its an expensive one it'll leave swirl marks/scratches all over it. Just give a very thorough clean all over and apply multiple thick coats...
You could just take the post lambda sensor out, cover it up and tuck it above the heatshield. Then put a bolt in the hole where the lambda used to be. Clear the fault using what's you've used previously and it shouldn't come back again.
Nick
Personally, i'd go with an early, miley 197 with good service history. That means it'll be cheap, the engine will have been nicely run in thus making better power, and even though the early 197 gearboxes werent the best they provide the shortest of ratios which can only be good for racing.
Then...
Mine made good power at RSTuning, though mine was one of the developent cars and first to be mapped so it took Paul hours to map it. I also think that timing is a big factor on whether the car will make good gains from the RS2, even on standard cams. I found out that the inlet cam on mine had...
This is way i'm starting to feel also. This may go off topic and I do apologise.
There's no doubting I love the RS2 as a product because of the way it 'transforms' the power delivery of the clio, but the cold hard fact is all this 'discussing' about what's better is pointless in terms of...
There's a difference between 'banter' and just being plain stupid tbh. He's had his viewpoint as to why he doesn't like the product, but now he's just doing anything to provoke an argument and complete mess a good discussion on a product.
Glad that when you text me earlier it cracked the 200bhp! My old engine this is, must have above 120k now and proving how strong these engines are when maintained properly! And obviously not forgetting Mikes handywork helped make the figures!
Adding 50mm extensions to the runner length made mine go from this...
To this...
With no additional mapping etc. So a 3.5bhp peak gain but the best bit was it gave me pretty much 10 lb/ft of torque gain.
Cheers matey! Indeed a few alright parts, should work well once theyre on the car!
Running et43 OZ F1's Chris, cheap and disposable when they get bent. If it rubs after i've fitted similar camber to yourself then i'll look into 'massaging' the arches. ;)
Cheers Tim!
Might look into getting...
Sod running around on R888's with that camber indeed, surely its easier (and cheaper) to revert to cheap road tyres when your not on track or 'on it' on the public roads.
There's room on the front, my cup ran 25mm's as well as ET37 wheels! That's wider than ET43 wheels with 205's.
You've got KW V2's right? Dampening wise stiffen the front a little more, with the rear being stiffer than the front and you'll be fine. Will grab a picture of mine in a bit. I was...
On the spacer front Phil. 25mm hubcentric on front with 2.5-3 degrees on neg camber, and then the rear get some of the 15mm hub spacers. May need a tad more camber on the rear or get the arches rolled but you should be okay if you have ET43 wheels I think. Sorted.
Means you can keep standard...