Since 2003 I've had all of them. I can't be arsed to give a full on review, but I'll summerise my thoughts on my Clios.
172 - a decent enough fun car, lack of ultimate grip made it great fun to hoon around in
182 - a better car, more grip, great fun on track
Trophy - a better car in some ways but more compromised and not as adjustable on the limit
197 - Looked better, felt heavier, stupid amount of grip, felt a bit vague, engine was s**t at low revs and when cold
200 - by far the best of the bunch. Pulls better, sounds better, looks better, corners better, has nice direct steering making mid corner adjustments really easy
PMSL at Alans comment about the R27 being similar to the 200. You have no idea how much better the 200 is to drive. The difference between the 197/R27 and 200 is far more noticable than the difference between the 182 and the Trophy.
Plus, no amount of ECU fiddling will sort out the lack of low down torque or cold running issuse the 197 has. Plus the R27 is just an over priced badging exercise used to introduce the cup suspension.
TBH yes i do! I've driven both. I borrowed a 200 and drove it to Lincoln and back, it was nice, but i wasnt exactly left feeling it was MILES better than a 197 at all.
Yes the 200 does feel different to the 197, in the same way as my 182 felt different to the 172 (mostly due to the cup pack and exhaust note TBH, so the car overall just seemed better but maybe wasn't). But for me at least, to say the 200 has somehow completely transformed the mk3 is a bit wide of the mark, it had mearly made some improvements, in the same way they did with the 182 over a 172.
You only have to read the evo reviews etc of the 182 at the time it came out to see how raving they all were when compared with the 172, such as here - http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/evocarreviews/43716/renaultsport_clio.html , but alas over time these slightly over enthusiastic write ups havent held water. IMO that will be the same case when the hype over the 200 dies down in a few years and people get less emotive about them. There will be loads of people posting up here saying "nothing in it", in the same way they now do with the 172 vs 182.
I'm not knocking the 200, i like them, but the cost difference doesnt seem worth it to me.
Get an R27. The 200 is just a great marketing gimmick, nothing drastic has changed.
Its exactly the same as the 172 vs 182 - at the time the 182 was meant to be miles better due to manifold etc, of course now that all the hype has died down everyone can see there is nothing in it.
Same as the 197 vs 200. If you get the R27 it will have the revised ECU map anyway, and who cares about the gearbox when it will probably still smash into a million peices one day.
The enthusiasm for the Trophy has never waned, and it's still held with the same high regard it had when it came out. As the 200 is most likely the last of it's kind, before we move on to small capacity turbos, it's likely to be remembered the same way.
Firmly agree, although 007 felt cursed it didnt half handle well, I prefer the steering feel of the 200 over the 1*2's and the turn in feels fantastic, I just cant get away with the gear ratio's and clunky feel of it, you just know its going to break
It didn't feel like a hot hatch. It felt underpowered due to the gearing/torque peak and extra weight over the Mk2.
The enthusiasm for the Trophy has never waned, and it's still held with the same high regard it had when it came out. As the 200 is most likely the last of it's kind, before we move on to small capacity turbos, it's likely to be remembered the same way.
Borrowing one isn't quite the same as living with them all for periods of time. I once borrowed a V6 for a day, but don't think I can really go in to its full character in depth. Having lived with the 197 for 4 years, the 200 is a far more complete package. I didn't want to believe the reviews, as I didn't really feel I wanted another Clio, but nothing else hit the spot.
If you're in to what the motoring press have to say, pretty much all of them felt let down by the 197, yet they all beat one off over the 200.
There is nothing in it, there's always been nothing in it with the hot Clios, but in terms of feel and driver confidence there's quite a lot in it.
That sounds a bit like I'm 197 bashing. I'm not, otherwise I wouldn't have kept mine as long as I did. Up to now it's been one of my favourite cars, along with the Trophy and Pug 306 GTi-6. The 200 just does what all of those cars did, rolled in to one.
Yeah, I'm still about Paul. Just not as active as I used to be. Just having a curry at work, and felt like exercising my fingers.
You know you want to: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rodstreet/sets/72157628842416693/
By the way, if you go for a 197, avoid BV08 SXY.
I'd listen to Lee over anyone, and ideally ignore Alan since he doesn't know what he's talking about.
197 - 200 is a huge step. Night and day.
Not marketing.
It was. And recalled/amended cars.
Yeah, it did bring bad luck with it, but what I car. I still rate the 172 Cup up there with it too. It may not have had the fancy dampers, but the reduction in weight was noticable.
It was the steering feel which surprised and sold me on the 200. I agree about the gearbox. Mine is hellish when cold, and doesn't like 2nd and 3rd until it's fully warmed up. The 197 had 4th gear synchro go and had to be replaced along with 4th gear.
Oh? I thought that was only on the <08 cars?
Were they made with it though? Because there's a chance some could've not been taken in for the recall isn't there?
And how has a revised steering rack and map made the 200 so much better? I'm not picking an argument, I'm genuinely asking lol