Search results

Some honest reviews of owners of V6 Clio...:D http://www.carsurvey.org/review_56341.htmlhttp://www.carsurvey.org/review_56341.html Simon

Yeah have all ways liked the 355 and 360 modena.....But would need a fortune to run one..... one for the lottery I guess?? then I can keep my V6....lol Simon.

Ferrari 348 average minor service £950:o Average Major service £1500-2000:o Cam belt changed every 30000 @ £1500-2000:o I think I will stick with my V6.....:D Simon.

Id have the V6, they are less common in UK than Ferraris...lol Also Ferrari running costs are just stupid.....way to expensive to run. Simon. but then again I am biased.....lol

They are 279bhp, but at 1800kg they are only 155bhp per tonne, not much more than your 172 and below the V6 255s ;) Simon.

Yep....bang indeed:o Simon.

Well in my handbook they recommend that the V6 255 uses 97RON where available, so I guess I will stick to Optimax at 98RON....feels better to me. Simon.

Yeah April 2003 is before they arrived here in UK, maybe the test cars had a "Button"??? mine doesnt... Simon.

Yeah buy a V6 255, you wont regret it....:D Simon.

I wanted V6 WOW, but at £4000 I think I will give it a miss?? far to much for just a number..... Simon.

Well Fair enough, I do intend to tweak the hell out of my Mk2 over the years, 450bhp is what I am after at some point in the future, with pin point handling to make a great road and track car, so springs, anti roll bars, superchager and so on will all go on my Mk2, I intend to keep it for many...

Well we could go on like this all day mate....it wont get us anywhere will it? The Mk2 has a huge amounts of upgrades over the mk1, and all make it better in my opinion...pal...:) New Gear box, wider track, new subframe, better setup, more power, better front end, bigger wheels, better power...

I have my V6 255 turned into AWD and change the engine to a 750bhp twin turbo V8. A Clio V8 750 turbo AWD sounds so much nicer.....lol Simon.

Well at 60 mph you are travelling at 88 per second so 0.5 second = 44 or approx 3.6 car lengths ...lol The gap is much biger by the time you reach 100mph ( where only 1 second gap = 146 or approx 12 car lenghts), and I would rather be 3.6 car lenghts in front than behind....lol ;) Simon.

Also if the Mk1 really does 5.8 to 60 in std form then I love my mk2 even more, as it has a better power to weight and better gear box for acceleration than a Mk1 so must do 60 in around 5 dead then....lol;) Simon.

Well let me see, IMHO, Mk2 looks better, is faster (sub 6 second car 153mph), handles better, much faster round a track as well as road, and in EVERY single road test I have read the MK2 comes out well on top..... Mk2 V Mk1.....MK2 everytime..... (standard to standard of course) sorry Mk1...

Welcome to the V6 club stusV6, I just know youre really gonna enjoy it...:D:D Simon.

Enjoy.....:D Simon.

Well at least your ok Chris, and at least no one else was involved. I have just had a narrow escape in my V6 when some Di*khead came round a corner on a narrow country lane well to fast and half on my side of the road, only my fast reactions stopped my V6 from losing its drivers side and just...