Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Oh ffs man, how can he have finished a track car project, without being on track?? Christ on a bike, you have to rev a car hard on track, you don't knock it into D and waft through Druids trying not to spill your Latte!!
I don't know why people go so far? My 172 was useable everyday, but great on track! Suspension, brakes, exhaust, seats. Removed the rear seats for track days/tip runs, perfect. Why go so far that the cars only useful in one situation??
All you acheive is a car that's 10% better for 5% of the time!
This. Older methods of casting/manufacturing parts meant that the parts were physically worn in (ie the rough edges removed) during use. Hence the early oil change which used to be required. Modern methods mean this is obselete.
Ask the lad that had my 1st 172, in his words it was the quickest...
100% unnecessary. With modern ecu's, if it were essential for component longevity (given that any failures would likely be paid for by the manufacturer via warranty), they'd simply have a lower rev limit for the running in period.
I've not run in a single car I've owned from new, none have had...
Modern engines don't need running in, I'm not sure why they even recommend it! Someone I know picked up a new 430 couple of year ago. Was told running it was essential due to it being a new engine, and under no circumstance should a new Ferrari engine be taken over a certain level etc.
That's...
Welcome!
I've had a 182 in the past, now in a 200. 200 is the better 'car', 182 is the better hot hatch, more interactive and ultimately more 'fun'.
Drive them both, decide which suits you best.