Hello,
A bit of advice if you could!
I was driving to work on Friday and ended up shunting a car infront of me about 3-5mph. We were on a roundabout and they suddenly braked… Pulled over on the side of the road there was no damage to any of the cars. I gave them my details, they did the same took a photo to prove no damage and drove to work.
Today, I've received a call from my car insurance saying I've been accused of driving into the back of the car; the people have received injuries and are claiming off me!
They both were fine; the woman was more bothered about her chocolate cake. They said they were fine and they drove off to their destination as did I.
The woman on the phone was really arsey and said that they aren't putting in a claim for damage to the car but to injuries to themselves. My reply to that was if the car wasn't damaged, how can they be injured? I received no injuries (admittedly a bit of pride damaged)
So I'm looking at losing my 2 years no claims and having to pay for someone who I think is blatantly trying to pull a fast one.
Where do I stand with this, I'm not going to roll over and admit that i've caused them injuries when they were walking around fine and the person bent over to take a picture of my car...
Thanks
(sorry if this doesn't make sense, I'm filled with rage)
A bit of advice if you could!
I was driving to work on Friday and ended up shunting a car infront of me about 3-5mph. We were on a roundabout and they suddenly braked… Pulled over on the side of the road there was no damage to any of the cars. I gave them my details, they did the same took a photo to prove no damage and drove to work.
Today, I've received a call from my car insurance saying I've been accused of driving into the back of the car; the people have received injuries and are claiming off me!
They both were fine; the woman was more bothered about her chocolate cake. They said they were fine and they drove off to their destination as did I.
The woman on the phone was really arsey and said that they aren't putting in a claim for damage to the car but to injuries to themselves. My reply to that was if the car wasn't damaged, how can they be injured? I received no injuries (admittedly a bit of pride damaged)
So I'm looking at losing my 2 years no claims and having to pay for someone who I think is blatantly trying to pull a fast one.
Where do I stand with this, I'm not going to roll over and admit that i've caused them injuries when they were walking around fine and the person bent over to take a picture of my car...
Thanks
(sorry if this doesn't make sense, I'm filled with rage)