So if i have a rs stamped lower inlet i then have matched inlets sorry ifni sound dumb ita juat im
Confused .
Mine DID have RS stamped inlets and although the casting is slightly better then others I've seen I still found an improvement when fitting matched inlets
Just to clarify the ones im selling are matched top and bottom
I must be the only person on here that noticed bugger all difference.
Maybe that's it then, as the first thing I did was get a decent exhaust, then inlets, remap, then the JMS V6 airbox/induction setup in that order.
So maybe getting inlets that early on was never going be noticeable.
Is there any info as to whether these (RS stamped) were fitted to ph1's, ph2's, early cars, late cars, 172's, 182's?
Depends on the casting of your standard inlets, I think mine were pretty good to begin with,
when I got matched inlets I didn't really noticed anything other than a smaller bank balance.
But alot of people have said it's one of the best mods they've done.
Make sure you check your lower inlet before you spend any money,
if it's got R.S. on it then the casting's much better than the non R.S. ones,
and a matched lower inlet won't really make much of a difference.
The only thing that matched inlets is realistically going to do is slightly alter the flow characteristics of the engine, because we are dealing with a speed/density based system it means that the ecu cannot see those changes others than via the lambda sensor (as it has no airflow meter)
There is no way its going to lead to better economy or better "throttle response" unless your engine had a fault to begin with that has been partially cancelled out by the slight change in flow.
At the top end you really should gain a couple of bhp from the better flowing inlet if its mapped correctly for the change, but thats about all you are realistically going to see, anything else people think they are seeing is likely to be placebo effect or incorrect measuring of before and after data.
Its a small change, and it gives small gains, but even small gains on these engines are hard to find many other places!
did you forget about the MAP sensor?
Correct me if I'm wrong but better airflow will increase performance even if its not much. It's logical.
No of course not, hence I said its a speed density based setup, but if it now flows better after the map sensor for the same pressure differential the ecu has no way of seeing the extra flow. Same speed (engine rpm) same density (MAP) = same fuelling as before.
flowing better after the MAP sensor will obviously increase air flow through the whole inlet, how else would it get to the lower inlet without going threw the top one first
Do you actually know what a MAP sensor is? It means manifold absolute pressure => it measures the absolute pressure in the inlet which is normally lower than atmospheric pressure on NA engines as you have a suction effect in the inlet. If you alter the airflow (slightly with matched inlets), you'll automatically alter the pressure in the inlet as these 2 things are physically related.
Do you actually know what a MAP sensor is? It means manifold absolute pressure => it measures the absolute pressure in the inlet which is normally lower than atmospheric pressure on NA engines as you have a suction effect in the inlet. If you alter the airflow (slightly with matched inlets), you'll automatically alter the pressure in the inlet as these 2 things are physically related.
but when you have a CAF 2inches off the ground at 3am in -10degrees, ram air innit! brap and ting
but when you have a CAF 2inches off the ground at 3am in -10degrees, ram air innit! brap and ting