Search results

I assume they have some UV lights which is causing the paint to fluoresce? (react) If so, use a tripod!! Try aperture priority, the camera may struggle exposing as it looks pretty complicated. If so, switch to manual until you get a good exposure. If the UV reactions are what I think they...

Weather looks good for tomorrow, clear skies in the afternoon apparently. So it'll be a tad chilly too. I've got to dig out my beanie and gloves lol! See you tomorrow :)

I like the leading lines you created using the barrier things (or whoever you call them), so the composition is good...although perhaps a bit on the 50:50 side. There's something odd about the B+W post processing though. Hard to explain, it's almost as if you made one of those dramatic HDR...

Well they would certainly need to be higher resolution too. Those sites are looking for very high quality work. Your photos are nice don't get me wrong, there are things you could improve though...little things like making sure the horizons are dead level, the post(?) in the bottom right of...

They would yes...but..saying this constructively...they would generally be looking for higher quality shots than that. By all means try, but I would be VERY surprised if any were accepted.

A car won't fail an MOT for the engine warning light being on at the moment, so I would be surprised if it failed on that. Just my 2c

Love the 3D effect of the logo!

DS2500s might not be man enough if it's a 100% track car. DS3000s are meant to be one up from the DS2500s. I say get neither and get PF97s. Simply epic braking power. But they will ruin your wheels!

It's not very obvious tbh, well I never found it to be.

lol I knew you wouldn't. You just get in and drive the thing lol!!

I had PF97 pads, I never had fade once, and every time it stopped immensely. Standard pads will turn to dust after a few corners.

Don't bother with the ridiculously heavy 197s for a track car, too big as well. Get a 172 cup, as don't have all the stuff you'd rip out anyway. The standard brakes will hold up fine with proper pads, no need for 4 pots.

Ask in the Burpspeed project thread. They use a nice little one on their dash (as they don't use the stock one).

Surely it'll be exactly the same as the 4?

I'm a bit dubious of those, find some reviews to see what people say, and example shots taken with it.

That 24-70mm is the equivalent of my Nikon version. A great all rounder lens, you could theoretically shoot a whole wedding with just that lens, it does everything. 70-200mm is good for the actual ceremony, as you don't have to be in the couples face. I would avoid wide angles, as they will...

Anything uber fast. 85mm 1.2 is a good canon lens from what I've heard. Honestly, brides and women love those super narrow DoF shots, when done well of course. Also, fast is better for low light which is always useful. If the lens has a maximum aperture smaller than f2.8, don't bother. Make...

Yup, and then you'll start your path on endlessly buying more and more filters. I wish Lee filters weren't so damn expensive, luckily they are always out of stock so that avoids temptation.

I may be wrong, but I don't think they do. Have a read of the specs (if any!) of them. From what you say though, a wired one would be best. Again, whatever you look at, make sure it's compatible with your camera, and is capable of bulb modes. My Nikon one has a lock switch, so you just flick...

Well most landscape togs will have a wired one, as they obviously have no benefits for it being wireless....but mainly when they do bulb shots, you can use the remote to 'hold' the shutter open, rather than physically holding it down on the camera, which can be a bit tedious for exposure of a...

Wireless or wired? I bought an ebay job wireless one, hasn't let me down yet. If you want a wired one, I would get a proper one though.

Filters are a good shout, some a relatively inexpensive and you can have a lot of fun with them. Firstly.....DON'T bother with a UV filter.....waste of time. Circ Pol filters are very useful. They can be used for a lot of things, from landscape to motorsport photography. Get a good brand one...

Nice shot Brazo. The only thing I would do to that is straighten the verticals a bit, like the building at the very left of the frame. Otherwise......thumbs up :)

I've never really needed it on location yet. I just find out before I leave. I'll keep an eye out if it ever goes on sale.

Yup I use that a lot. Great program, I have it on my desktop but haven't shelled out all that dosh for the app. Great for planning ahead too, already checked so see where the sunset will be when I'm on holiday.

I'm not that bothered, I certainly won't be replacing my D3 any time soon that's for sure. I just hope Nikon don't do a Canon, so to speak.

That's a very challenging lens to use! You have to be uber creative to get some awesome shots with it. Nice start though :)

Will do, would be good to catch up, see what you're up to these days.

You say that, but I'm still concerned (well not really actually) about the ISO performance on them. With 36MP I doubt they're anywhere near as good as the D700......but I hope I'm wrong. But then I'm a photographer who values ISO performance over MP, one of the reasons I'm glad I'm with Nikon.

That'll be a tricky decision here at work. We use the D700 for one of our products, so I assume we'll move over to the D800.....but which one! We take photos of fingerprints, so I guess the D800E will be the better choice, as we don't really encounter any moire issues. I'd be intrigued to see...