Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Been playing it all morning. Still enjoying it just as much. The practice/quali times, I couldn't give a f**k if they are fictional. In real racing you're racing times in those situations, so there's no difference.
As far as the racing is concerned, still enjoying it, just ignoring the times...
Tbf looks come into any purchase, but are completely subjective, so I guess pretty void when comparing.
To prove the point, I met a 197 owner today that prefers the looks of the 200 ;).
For me, I can't think of a single reason to choose an ek9 over a dc2. And a lot that people put pictures...
The ep3 was a better engineered car than a 182/trophy. But not as good a drivers car. It's irrelevant to how enjoyable a car is to drive.
A 205gti is basic beyond belief compared to most hatches. Far better to drive.
All imo.
I've only read one uk review of the ek9 in a decent uk magazine article (is not max power etc). It finished 5/6, only car they preferred it to is the mk4 golf.
Everyone I know that's had a go in one, all prefer the dc2, by a distance.
Seems that a lot of people like them as they are a cult car...
I love how much of an awkward c**t alonso is, and vettel looks a bit wild when you follow him.
I need a temporary divorce tbh, a good few weeks to concentrate on this while the wife buggers off.
Depends what you'll be using it for. Daily commuting etc, the 200 is miles ahead. Track and purely as a fun car, the 182 is more suitable. Make it a trophy and you shouldn't even lose much on it.