Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Would MON be a more useful number to use as it's a better representation of the performance of the fuel.
With it being tested under more load at a higher rpm and at different ignition timings?
Details are on here mate.
28th April at Shinerama in Altrincham
http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?687414-Introduction-To-Detailing-Number-4-Dodo-Juice-Sunday-28th-April
I quite like the plain look mate. Navigation is fine and easy to use.
Glad you haven't gone too fancy like some photography sites, with flash players and scrolling galleries.
Much nicer.
The ones at ISO 200 look fine. I would have stuck with a low ISO on a bright day like that.
The ISO 800 ones were causing the aperture to shoot up to f/22+