Search results

yeah by evo that indepently test all cars. Get over it. Your dads car isnt that fast ;) Go and have a cry on his shoulder ;)

Not than mine which has the same tyres as yours. lol

Does a boxster s only have 205 bhp? Somebody better tell porsche as they say it has 260bhp lmfao

Traffic onto an airstrip actually ;)

Thats cos of the wider tyres. ;)

You obviously have had some painful experiences with your dad, I'll leave it well alone ;) And the 172 cup has the best pwr/weight out of all the clio renaultsports (bar the v6) so there ;) 182 cup = 168 bhp/ton vs 172 cup= 171 bhp/ton ;)

it was the previous boxster s which is slower than the new one. And it was an S. I was following it for some distance in traffic beforehand

Look my cup has been verifed 0-60 in 6.5 by numerous mags. The boxster s's 0-60 in 5.5 sec is a "manufacturers claim". With the boxster s being a poor example of one and mine being a quick one, and the added weight of a passenger they could quite easily be near equal. You just dont like the...

^^ Ahem....

lol I always get my own way ;) *Dummy back in*

lol I thought that was the mx5 ;)

What with a boxster s badge on the boot and twin tailpipes? How do you work that one out?

I wouldnt say they were girls cars, not as aggressive as a 911 but they handle amazingly and have a fair bit of poke. I would trade in my cup for one. Evo have them as their sports car of choice and thats over elises and the like. Fraser

yeah with quite a bit more power. The original boxster s has 260 bhp and a bhp/ton of 200 according to evo. Maybe I have a good example of a cup and his boxster was a bit sick ;)

Well mate you do have a full fat 172 which is about 0.5 sec slower to 60 and the extra passenger he was carrying would account for the extra weight and therefor slower acceleration due to a reduced pwr/weight. And it wasnt a tiptronic, there wasnt any rev slurring between changes. With these...

Well unless you were there you couldnt say. He had a passenger and I didnt which could easily account for the 0-60 diff.

I had a shot on a private road just the other day against a old model boxster s from a standing start. He had a passenger and I was on my own and there was nothing in it. Neck and neck, up into 4th gear.. After that I think he would have had me. He got a slightly better start due to the rwd...

Yeah Im desperate to get it lowered but I dont want a concrete ride or a missing front bumper from speedhumps! Cheers for all the other comments. It needs a wash first! Fraser

Its a k750i and I put the settings for the camera to "sharp" which seems to be an improvement.

I'll have to see if my other half will let me out to play or not. Got to ask permission ;)

Hmm let me think about that for a moment..... ;)

Well middo it got you to look at it anyway ;) I'd def like coilovers and they would be the first mod, but I was thinking about another car.....

Needs lowered but i want to be able to get over speedhumps as there are tons of them near me! ;)

Heres a pic of my cup from 2day taken with my new camera phone. I cant be bothered to clean it because of the roads! Argh! What do people think?

Appart from the air con, colour, different glass, airbags, spare wheel....... etc etc. No substitute ;)

lmfao these skoda owners make me laugh ;) j/k :P

Yeah these skodas are alrite for diesels, but everyone I've had a shot against needs to change up much earlier losing vital ground.

Im sorry to p!ss on your campfire mate but my 172 cup is 100% std and got a 15 sec dead on a slippery 1/4 mile track. ;) And my terminal was 97 mph. :P Oh and it was my first ever 1/4 mile ;) Fraser

Saw you the opposite side of the renault garage getting out the car. What mods have u done to it? Cheers Fraser

Whats the widest rubber I could go for on a std 172 cup with turinis? I know the alloys are the same width as the 182 so 205's should be a prob. Can they go as far as 215's? And would this affect handling or acceleration? I wouldnt have thought so as it isnt increasing the rolling diameter...