Search results

Not sure about the rear facing bazooka.

Not as asked but on a road car, when I fitted it I thought it made a difference, but when I removed it didn't really notice anything.

Run my alloy ones for a year no problems, although I didn't measure suspension angles before and after.

Yes you are correct, to fit a phase 2 exhaust to my phase 1 I had to fit the phase 1 cat with 2 sensors as its longer than the phase 1 one with one sensor, with hindsight I would have just made up a small connecting piece to fit the gap, cause its very fiddly connecting the cat to the exhaust...

Must go to spec savers, thought it was y

Unlikely to have alloy bonnet, yes? and road tax will cost more, yes?

Is it not because the tax is emissions based on post 2001

Worth fitting to get rid of the original manifold to cat connection I reckon, real fiddly thing.

Nothing cheap will make any difference, apart from that its just an engine and will respond to normal tuning techniques, and although you don't want to hear it a 172 would cost less.

The only issue when fitting 17,s is they make your brakes look small.

Hasn't a Maserati merak got rear buttresses like that or maybe im confused

Any excuse to put a photo up A bit small, never mind.

Yes over thinking as I see it, its the leverage on the actual bar that matters , mounting (within reason) has no bearing.

Forgot I had moved the wheel barrow and while reversing into the garage and looking over my shoulder managed to scrape the door and wing with the handle of the barrow putting a massive scratch in them, god knows how much that's knocked of the value.

Attempting to change the cat on my phase 1, what a crap job, nearly impossible to get hand/spanner on the 10mm nuts, the way simple jobs become nightmares on this car will be the reason I sell it I think.

best idea,

Mine has aircon, never use it and still plan to remove it, this weather is a one off, wont happen for another 5 years probably.

Could you send it to me as well please if I send you my e-mail, think my change time is approaching, cheers will send it anyway, ignore if I am assuming too much.

So is there not a guide (accurate) on here at all?

Assuming clio, have only seen powerflex advertised, never done a search

195,s give more clearance, bit lighter?, more grip in the wet assuming everything else is equal?

Don't buy wheels to suit others, you wont please every one anyway, do what you like its your car.

Top marks for the work that's gone into that, and while its not for me I don't actually mind it.

Doubt there is much weight to be saved by removing things not noticeable to passengers, audibly or visually.

Only one w/s in many years of driving and that was in Norfolk in my first 172.

Bit of harmless fun, no one hurt although obviously gonna get a talking to.

Would agree with that for a dedicated track car , but for road use should they not be split, right hand front/ left hand rear and vice versa although you would then need 2 adjustable bias valves.

If its only the outlets and nothing to do with abs or not then I would keep with the normal 182 one.

So what is the difference between the master cylinders, as the cup one is always suggested when this question comes up.

while we are talking flamers