Search results

You the man! Well done...4 grand well spent! And so f**king what if I drive a diesel. It does what I need it to do. Grow the f**k up, racer boy.

Absolutely - you can spend 10k on it if you want, no problem with that but I can still think of better ways to spend 4k than on a Clio. It might be fast and fun but still, not a chance I would!

So SC'd Clios... They must be dull if we are not talking other exotica already! I'll save my £4k for the Porsche!

Says it all!

Not really my point. 4k for what you get is gash, imo. Each to their own. 100 notes on insurance is okay though.

Sounds like fun but for 4k, you are getting around 75 bhp and 50 torques. That's a lot of cash per horsepower. Does the insurance jump much?

Sounds like fun but for 4k, you are getting around 75 bhp and 50 torques. That's a lot of cash per horsepower. Does the insurance jump much?

Two of the better looking cars on the roads, at present!

Nice leasing going on there!

Sounds rapid!

You can get 40 mpg from a 172. They are very good on fuel.

Still don't make it luxury.

Rather harsh...none of the 1*2's had a fantastic interior. The PH1 interior is terrible. Anyone buying a Clio for interior luxuries are in the wrong car section.

£2K on a Clio, any Clio is laughable.

Yes. As you can see from my comment, I liked the comments the dude made about the 197, other than the performance comment. Have you actually owned a Clio, or have you just driven around in your girly BMW since the beginning of time?

Good write up but I fail to see how this is possible. They are both the same, performance wise. Unless by "raping" you mean a baw hair? They are the best looking Clios and have massive road presence! Mind you, they are quite large now.

There is a vast difference in MPG.

7/10

Stick some slabs in the boot and some fatties up front!

Is BS.