Search results

I wouldn't bother. From what I can work out, the following applies: 1) The SDK + Simulator are available freely 2) If you want to run your code on a real device you have to pay $99 to become a member of the developer programme, this obviously also includes distribution channels. It's a pretty...

Time to introduce the hamster to the dyson.

Yeah, well that will work. I just assumed you already had data on it, otherwise I'd have just told you to have done that!

Actually, once you've installed that you can run the enable script that is included in the install dmg and that will use this driver everytime you plug in an NTFS drive. It will appear exactly as before, except you'll be able to write to it. No need for macfusion.

Sorry, you'll also need this. http://macntfs-3g.blogspot.com/ this is the user mode driver for macfuse to read ntfs drives.

something you see! macfuse is driver which provides os x with extra filing systems. it's clever because it's basically a set of plugins that run at application level, which makes them a doddle to write and debug. Once you've installed macfuse, it knows how to mount new filing systems...

You won't because it's a command line system for doing the fs mounting. If you want to mount stuff via a gui, then install this: http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/users/08/mgorbach/MacFusionWeb/ Job done.

50 day retention. Awesome completion. Auto par and auto-unrar are worth it alone. You get more gb's on NNTP because anything you download will be larger and you have to get the headers. I've not used NNTP for a long time because the HTTP interface is so much easier and better...

psml. Brilliant. :lolup:

It's because it's NTFS, you can read it but cannot write. If you want to write to NTFS, then download and install macfuse and you'll be able to mount it rw. http://code.google.com/p/macfuse/

Pah..skimping. My £1K cable has a better class of 1s and 0s. ;)

What did he say?!

easynews. Web interface, online search, auto-par and auto--unrar of archives. NNTP is so 90's.

b****cks. People will believe what they want to believe. I could put a £1000 cable on audio and make another one up at work from scrap and you would not be able to tell any difference. Seriously, you shielding is the key here. Having expensive cables won't make any difference when what's...

what says 'connection timeout'? That doesn't sound like an airport/wifi problem, that sounds like something a web browser would display.

This is where it came from. http://www.destroydrop.com/javascripts/tree/default.html I think it has a problem in an old version of IE or something, but I fixed that in my version. I also altered it so that it didn't require the root node so that it works like the product list. It was...

Is "remember this network" ticked in airport preferences? Tick that and it will remember it, make sure you let it store the password in the keychain as well.

defaults write com.apple.finder DisableAllAnimations -bool NO will revert it back to standard. Yes, that tinker tool looks like it does the same, it's just a "gui" on the command (and more) that I posted before.

Mines all css, tables are freaking annoying. You can spend so much time trying to make them work on a complex layout. I did my design in illustrator for a number of reasons: 1) It's vectors, so it scales. This was important to me so that I could adjust the size until I was happy. 2)...

Cough... ...Did that do what you want?

Cheers. Yeah. Wrote it all as I couldn't find a shopping cart system that worked how I wanted it to, they were either to basic or looked like crap. Figured the best way was just to write my own. That way I could make the site look and work exactly how I wanted. I'm not a web designer...

View your page in IE6 and you'll see how bad the images look. I've used tricks in the CSS/Javascipt so that FF/Safari/IE7+ use pngs but IE6 uses jpgs. Here's one I did at work. There are some "invalid" div's and stuff, but nothing seems to mind so I can't be arsed to fix it. I designed it...

ummn..let me see. ;)

I don't like it, but that's only my opinion! Also you've used a PNG with transparency which won't work properly in any version of IE below version 7 (there are ways of "beating" this using active-x to render it, but that may pop up security warnings).

Hence why I didn't say all are 2.4! Edit: But it does look like that what I said...wasn't what I meant.

The new macbooks are 2.4GHz.

Crikey. Sage have written something that isn't utter crap? :eek:

http://www.sugarcrm.com/crm/

and fwiw, it won't make any difference to performance as it's offloaded to the graphics card anyway.