Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Why is the 172 superior?? I don't see that it is definitively better. Still reckon the mk1 is more driver focused. The 172 is better if your gonna be covering miles and miles, but then why would you choose a clio for that?
all this coming from the man who just gave up his valver for a 172! lol
Rear arches are a massive bonus. If the car is for fun then a MK1 is better than a 172. The engine may not need to be reconditioned and even so the most cost effective way of doinf that would be to wait on ebay/CS for a cheap low miler and dump it in.
Go for the Mk1. I'd value it at 1200-1300 at...
im worried that i'm going to regret replacing my valver with a ph2172.....Not sure yet
Pretty sure the valver has more grip...
Anybody care to argue that? lol
shame you leavin brookes mate. I'll miss that neck.....that's almost as long as mine. ROFL haha
I'm gonna beat you to 1000 posts mate. theres no saving it now!