Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Not denying the power, just that it comes in a whacking great big lump in the middle of the rev range. Prime example is your own car, Chip, which is a far more progressive and linear delivery. I'd imagine that's much more fun to drive as there is still a small incentive to "chase" revs.
Great video guys, glad you know what you're doing and have big insurance cover as the thought of taking a PW to a lambo bay scares the sh*t out of me!!
I disagree with anyone who says her business proposition isn't good. I'd look there if I wanted a lease.
Read this.
http://econsultancy.com/uk/blog/9067-lings-cars-the-art-of-persuading-visitors-to-buy
Not surprised the 4 is faster, but I am surprised at the gap, especially when pausing the vid on the speedo @ circa 100kph it's a fair lead. Considering very little separates them 0-60 (6.9 for the 200 vs a claimed 6.7 for the 4).
Lots of variable in there as well, undoubtedly it goes more than...
Have a look in the engine section mate. Lots of things to suit all different budgets.
Honestly though, not going to get much more "poke" this side of at least a grand.
Yes, it is possible to fix stone chips without a full respray, although it will depend how bad the previous ones have been bodged.
There is a brilliant stone chip repair guide on detailing world.