Search results

I Didn't say that. I don't have to resort to using a PC because I can do everything I need to on the mac. I've got a PC, but it gathers dust, it's not been turned on for months. Only time I ever used it was for google earth, but theres a mac version now. :)

Says the guy driving a clio ;)

Works fine for me on a mac, can't comment about it on a PC though, thankfully I don't have resort to that. ;)

I use vi when I'm developing stuff on linux, it just works and I know the keys! Stick me infront of emacs and I'll melt! ;) I use visual studio on the PC. I use XCode on the mac. I use crossworks when doing embedded stuff. But, I digress....

Yes. I sometimes do it when php is the easiest way to achieve something simple, i.e a simple script.

Nice one :)

want to start from 128.0.0.0 as that's the first legal subnet address, not 255.0.0.0. Ping sounds like a good idea as long as it's configured to respond the icmp echo packets!

What are you looking at? Is this a packet in ethereal? Destination is the IP where it's trying to connect to. You won't see subnet information because it isn't transported, it's only used for working out if a packet needs to go through a gateway. Should be trivial to work out the subnet as...

How on earth has it allowed somebody to do that? :S Edit: Fricking smiley code on this board!!! grr.

No problem. The ARP requests will have been from your ip scanner program as it tried to resolve an ip to a ethernet address.

Ethereal will set your network card in promiscous mode and will capture all packets on the network. It's possible that it will spew out some packets onto the network, then again it might not. Any traffic it generates you'll be able to see. I use ethereal all the time at the moment because...

use ethereal, it's more than likely it'll spew some packets out onto the network and then you at least have a starting point.

Are you on 8Mbit? If so, check if you're on an interleaved or fast path - if on interleaved it definately won't be helping.

They are. Risc OS Ltd is still doing development. OS X is Risc OS on steriods and in 2006.

What they said above I'm afraid.... ...plus you need to lose the google stuff on the right hand side, not very professional.

http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/ Here's what you can expect to see in Vista SP7 ;)

Yum! :) http://www.apple.com/macpro/

I'm sleepy.

The banners at WWDC. Mac OS X Leopard Hasta la vista, Vista and Mac OS X Leopard Introducing Vista 2.0 http://www.macnn.com/articles/06/08/06/os.x.leopard.vista.20/ http://www.macnn.com/articles/06/08/06/os.x.leopard.vista.20/ Snigger. Snigger.

Here's a second hand iPod, thanks for all your hard work.... ....wouldn't go down well with me!!!!

Slightly digressing....(apologies) Where are you off to in Oz? How long for?

What's the point? Any particular reason? Use Applications/Utilities/Disk Utility Click the New Image icon and save it to another disk Click on the restore tab Drag the drive from the left hand side to the "Source Box" Drag your disk image to the destination Click Restore. Obviously the...

I'll save you the trouble! Here's the WinFS teams blog. http://blogs.msdn.com/winfs/archive/2006/06/26/648075.aspx

Re: More proof that VISTA will be a piece of sh*t WinFS is dead mate. It's not going to be in vista period. Some of it's features are going into other MS products like SQL Server.

I've seen 2.16Ghz engineering samples sell for cheaper than the 2.13Ghz core duo....there are plenty around.

Yep, runs fine on my PowerMac G4 733 (with no L3 cache either!). The core-duo mac mini which we have kicking around is very rapid. Edit: I've got a feeling that my 733 only has 256Mb of RAM as well, maybe 512.

I'm tempted..... ...but I'm more tempted by the core solo because meroms are known to work in them... Of course, we all know macs are sh*te though don't we ;) Edit: lol. Just read the media center thread talking about meroms!

I think the "web ticket" queue is currently over a week long. Might want to try the phones, it'll only take 2 or 3 hours to get through, assuming you can get in the queue in the first place.

Exactly, it makes sense - no brainer really. If you're a 2GB user (which I believe plusnet have a *lot* of), then it'll cost you £15 a month for a basic TV package and broadband, or if you're already a subscriber nothing. Or an extra tenner for 40 or 50 GB (can't remember) cap.

They were. Unfortuantely since then their quality of service went downhill faster than their share price!