Search results

just done the same with the williams, thats 4.9 with a 12 or more stone passenger

oh yeah, standard 52 VTS 200ish miles 2nd and third gear

iv just trimmed a video of the saxo with about 200 miles on it 40-70, 5.10 secs, if someone wants to hsot it, its 682 kb

i know mate!, but that was my point, there too slow to be a contender:)

yeah they a bit slow, i destroyed my mates in the williams, it was embarrassing!

iv got B16 COK on retention if someone wants to make me an offer;) before anyone says it im not selling it cos its inappropriate!

someone advertised that on here a while back and got laughed at i think!

just done the same with the williams, thats 4.9 with a 12 or more stone passenger

oh yeah, standard 52 VTS 200ish miles 2nd and third gear

iv just trimmed a video of the saxo with about 200 miles on it 40-70, 5.10 secs, if someone wants to hsot it, its 682 kb

who said owt bout saxo mate?

lol, youve got 30 bhp or more at the wheels than iv got at the engine!, so i know il be well hammered, anyways it is 2.0 vs 1.6. so all i can do is my best. at least well have some fun vids, which is what makes it all worth while for the laff watching it afterwards:D

who said owt bout saxo mate?

oh yeah, it would have been monaco blue:oops:

anyways before theres a valver owner uproar, ill just say that a valver is not faster, i understand all the varying power things and driver. put it this way against a good standard valver i doubt id get beat having raced two.

shiraz mate, i raced it to high speed, although my car is rather quick for a williams

lol, youve got 30 bhp or more at the wheels than iv got at the engine!, so i know il be well hammered, anyways it is 2.0 vs 1.6. so all i can do is my best. at least well have some fun vids, which is what makes it all worth while for the laff watching it afterwards:D

yes mat were trying to get one together, look in the meetings section mate, wanna get some decent shots of all the cars, come along!

okey dokey, i went all defensive then:D, anyways the real test is at the weekend when i get pannaed by paddys 172 craggy

all i can suggest is the new ones do have the 130 bhp or so that some might suggest????????

jealously will get you nowhere weight, what do i need to lie for, iv got a williams satin my garage that would cane my saxo, i didnt get the saxo to replace it as a fast car, it was just a nippy runaround. thats two that have bit the dust. but i just make it up for the laff. craggy

oh yeah, it would have been monaco blue:oops:

right guys, im gonna say it now, but its true cos iv raced two in two days, yesterday a phase one and just now a phase two. cos i was bored iv just been out on the hunt and to rack up the mileage(currently 950). i was going round a roundabout and i spotted a mint phase two 16v on a N plate...

anyways before theres a valver owner uproar, ill just say that a valver is not faster, i understand all the varying power things and driver. put it this way against a good standard valver i doubt id get beat having raced two.

shiraz mate, i raced it to high speed, although my car is rather quick for a williams

yes mat were trying to get one together, look in the meetings section mate, wanna get some decent shots of all the cars, come along!

okey dokey, i went all defensive then:D, anyways the real test is at the weekend when i get pannaed by paddys 172 craggy

all i can suggest is the new ones do have the 130 bhp or so that some might suggest????????

jealously will get you nowhere weight, what do i need to lie for, iv got a williams satin my garage that would cane my saxo, i didnt get the saxo to replace it as a fast car, it was just a nippy runaround. thats two that have bit the dust. but i just make it up for the laff. craggy

right guys, im gonna say it now, but its true cos iv raced two in two days, yesterday a phase one and just now a phase two. cos i was bored iv just been out on the hunt and to rack up the mileage(currently 950). i was going round a roundabout and i spotted a mint phase two 16v on a N plate...