Search results

https://www.autobild.de/artikel/renault-twingo-rs-turbo-fahrbericht-783737.html The one built by Renault Germany, would of been cool if it made production.

Post it to efi parts

Woah now! It has a massive 41bhp I'll have you know 😂

No one mentioned old clios in this thread 🤷🏻‍♂️ and the clio wasn't even a spunk bubbles thought when this came out. Back when they were the correct wheel drive 😁

Ahh thats one of them modern cars...

My neighbour runs his own Garage so did me a solid and let me come in and use his hydraulic press to build a shaft. Pushed off both the cups/tulips and reassembled the one I wanted in the correct orientation (GT Tulip on the DCI shaft and then the GT spider on the 172 outer shaft) I measured the...

that said, it wasn't present on the DCI cv joint I inspected, the spider is bottomed out on the splines already

Not looked yet, this is getting done on a spare set of inner shafts so I can do everything in one hit rather than have to keep returning to the job. Well thats the plan anyway

Be nice to get more than 0 😂

Well all should line up lol. We will see 😁🤞

It does as measured above. Gt inner shaft and dci inner shaft are different lengths so I'll be using the gt cup on the dci shaft 👍🏻bearing carrier will still line up fine

Its on a 2 piece shaft on the drives side same as a later 172/182. Distance from the gearbox to the bearing is fixed by the shaft and bearing carrier on the block. All the movement/slop and articulation is done after the bearing? I need to gain more space/travel after the bearing to the hub...

sending to commence

Yep :giggle:, for some reason my head isn't processing that the inner shaft will effectively be a touch shorter after the support bearing and allow more depth/travel for the outer half of the shaft. (too little sleep to much medication :D)

free weight saving, in the bin

So I've done some bad maths and I think I can gain and extra 12mm of plunge by swapping the cup and spider off the GT shafts to the DCI/172 shaft on the drivers side. If someone could agree with me that would be great lol compared between the 2 the GT cup sits 5mm further on the shaft to start...

Yep you were the closest 👍🏻 I will have a look through the garage and find something you really don't need from my piles of crap 😁 pm me an address

Totally forgot to go back and check who was closest 😂

so will this allow the spider to sit further into the joint as such then or the spider further down the shaft? I will definitely take a look, I have a few spare shafts in the garage so will see if its on them, and my shaft uses a 172 outer half shaft so should be as you described (y)

I didn't even know there was one in there, but I will take a look for sure, do you have a pic of what you mean? Free is good (y) :D