Search results

the standard tail lights are fine no need to change lol! as for lowering only springs id fit to standard dampers are eibach or simiar height ones as they wont stress them too much! anything else go for springs and dampers, apex -60mm would be ok if they do them for it yet, or if your feeling...

my 172 gets better MPG than my 1.2 16v did!

thats mint mate!! my mates got a yellow one and just fitted one of they ARC super intake induction boxes, i asked him what he thought about it and his reply was... "Cars shouldn't make noises like this!"

lol never noticed that!

i saw one tonight on a car that said RENAULTSPORT CLIO 172 CUP the renaultsport was in the renaultsport font, clio in the clio font, 172 in italic and cup in the cup font. looks horrid lol

looks very good for the price, id get rid of that air filter though!

mine went at 30k, so tbh for the price id go for brand new ones their not expensive, £75 i payed for both.

thats been thru a carwash lol

sunstrips are gay

dont abuse the box and you'll be fine, theres issues with 172 boxes but if your not harsh with it u'll be fine!

id go for DCi100 intercooler, pannel filter, decat then remap

your getting flared arches and you dont know what they are?!?!

sounds like mine when the lambda sensor went but it was only when it was cold it done that

who am i kidding, i still f**king love it!!

you can turbocharge it for a couple of hundred quid if you go diy and old skool (2 head gaskets, copper spacer etc thats what we done on the 1.4 saxo turbo we built) but you still wont be able to run high enough boost to get decent power, 130bhp if your lucky!

.9 over book lol it rattles and bangs and knocks and clunks and clicks, need to stop being as rough as a badgers arse with it, was fine when i got it lol

nope no 8000k, standard bulbs. point and shoot is hard as fook at night lol aye cars pretty clean in person but its still a piece of shite

8000k looks fuking horrible my mate has them on his corsa! 4300k ftw!

aye, no bad xenons ablaze aye!

Didnt have a decent camera to hand but was out and bored so these will do lol!!

no bad

and also mark fish and hill power

in theory they are great, a supercharger that doesnt use engine power to run or need majour modification to fit BUT.. they just dont generate any preassure!

what modifications lol

ive been looking for a project car for ages now might turbo charge a 1.2 16v just to show its possible to run mega power with enough cash lol

nice guide mate, sound good yeah? how would a set of 6.5" sound amped without a sub as i dont really want to add the weight of a sub but the standard speakers sound w**k! lol

40mm hardly looks any lower on the dynamiques, id go for atleast 60mm

you can use a standard 1.2 16v turbo engine or convert a d4f to turbo but its only 100bhp hardly a decent conversion, and its not really tunable without massive work!

unless its been on an engine dyno then its not a proven 76bhp but assuming the same RR, same conditions etc then id say you;ll gain 5-7bhp if that. mine was RR'd at 82bhp but it was never RR'd before mods so theres no way to tell if i got a genuine 7bhp or not!

unfortunatly the 1.2 16v doesnt share any parts with the bigger engines so you cant really mix and match parts like you can do with some engines especially the older vauxhall engines. my mate had an n/a 1300 16v starlet SR and we fitted an inlet manifold from a corolla and advanced the...