Search results

braodbean, its a nice car only problem is that its average in everything it does except the way it looks. We are agents for Ren and Porshe and area FIA representatives along with a whole host of MTA organisations. SO yes i do get to drive a load of lovely cars.

i smite your opinon with my opinion hammer! DOWN WITH YE!!!! i like brown bread, you like boys.......yer choice! :P

people who rag their car to a soundtrack.................its very odd.

28.57

or the fact that they are pampered like babies mechanically.

that wasnt a 2ltr though. And as such nobody makes a kit of parts to turbo your car.

that wasnt a 2ltr though. And as such nobody makes a kit of parts to turbo your car.

sorta, running in is one part, but when manufacturers make the engine there are tolerances allowed, and not everything is identical, you can just be lucky with the pick and mix of parts you get in your engine.

indeed, my father never ever bothered running engines for his race team unless they were ragged from day one.

-1 point!!!!! were even...lol.

servo effect too.

decrease combustion chamber volume

4100-4500ft/sec....not too bad, but really depends on compenent strength. Mmmmmm, oval cylinders lol

Fine fine fine, the short and simple answer is: In a capacity limited engine you need to run more rpm to process more air to burn more fuel with. To run more rpm the bottom end assembly will need to move faster, this increases piston speeds and puts added strain on rods/crank and the...

undersquare, YUM!

like a steel I beam, it refers to the crossectinal shape. But i hate telling non clued up people the meanings as i end up droaning on and on about why, how etc etc........then they know a tiny bit about one area which crosses into another which you have to explain further blah blah, and it...

im pretty sure H section is in english...........let me go consult my sources. . . . . . . . . . . . . yup it is

you will most probably need H section rods and a special crank to run 9000rpm or more.

not as simple as that, your gonna have to concentrate a bit on teh bottom end so that the teeny little motors dont throw their toys out the sump lol. Too much to do and no real point.

no need, the brakes dont do much at all, infact they are pretty pants.

i loved that guy going on about camber...........only used in F1...sheesh. Hands up who has notices michelins run less camber and a wider tyre than bridgestone runners yet suffer from greater inner edge wear. Or the completly different profile. THey are making it all up on compound, maybe...

can i clear this up please! hehehe If i had a V6 i would sit and look at it, then get in my 172 and pretend the V6 drove as nicely lol. No harsheties, its the truth, the V6 is by no means a drivers car, its nice, sounds nice, nice motor and gearbox, but jesus is it horrid to drive...

yea, better not! His 1.6 is 50 times better than our 1.8s.

been smoking crack or something?

haha, im still giggling cause you got rid of the 16V which would if had less problems. Have fun in the ol MK3!!!

sheesh, ive written it a billion times! @80C 1 Bar @ 1000rpm 3Bar @ 3500rpm, above that is a bonus Mine is about 6 when cold, 3-4 when 100C

but then you cant see the coolant.......or is there a level tube?

why is their a K-Tec sticker on their tool chest at the back? lol

no