Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
The battery on mine is great. I was super anal about it to start with. Always right down every single time, then charge till fully charged.
Can't remember the last time I turned it on now :o
Well I wouldn't say 24mm was 'super wide' really.
What do you take pictures of mostly? You're fairly well covered.
Do Sigma do a 10-20mm for the Sony fit?
Lol. Jeeees. Didn't realise it was time of the month. Not sure where my English is terrible though :(
I wasn't having a go, nor was I criticising your work. I've seen better than yours and I've seen a lot worse, but that wasn't my point.
You say you're part time, so I was expecting you to...
Lol.. 'If expenses are covered' so thought, he says he's part time, so will just be a nominal fee, while he learns his trade!
Can't take the expenses (hardly like you're traveling to NZ) out of what you charge?
172 Cup was good, Renault realise people like the more 'focused' car but then just decide to bolt the 'Cup' name to every model to get more sales.
And for the billionth time. There is no such thing as a 172 FF!! :rolleyes:
I'd rather have non-cup packed 182 than a Cup.
People are always going to try and defend what they own, but nobody else is sticking up for it for a reason.
Well lets say at f5.6 or something, the area of focus is quite large. So if you imagine you're focusing on a ruler. If you intend to focus on 10cm and you miss it a bit, it doesn't really matter as whole area around it will be in focus. From probably 7cm all the way up to 13cm will be in focus...