Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
That all sounds fair enough I'd say cheers!
As to the OP I got my 172 on 58k and is on 62k now and flies:D at the min and it seems to be one of the so called "good ones" going by what I have read on here;) High millage shouldn't be a prob if well looked after imo
182 depends on budget etc....also depends if you get a so called "good one" as to which is quicker in a straight line (I have kept up with a cup easy in mine:rasp: ) and just over 2 sec diff on a track isn't much in the real world.
tbh I would rather be parking my 172 than my old mans pug 406 estate (or alot of bigger cars). At least its short and the wheels are close to the corners.
I got a good £100 off my insurance for been a member of CS so worth doing still.
As for this Williams thing, agree to disagree (but remember your on a Clio forum;) ). It wasn't the best car ever and it certainly wasn't the worst car ever.
Some people prefer FWD others RWD and some both. You...
The 205 won many a rally, how come you aint mentioned those? there closer to the williams than the M3.
Also the Corrado VR6 is another fine example of a car that is regarded as a "truly great drivers car" (and was FWD!). I dont remember those winning anything speacial appart from peoples hearts;)
Its a modern classic because it was one of the best in class at the time and set new standards in that class.
It takes more than just winning races to make a great ROAD car.
The problem is a car does not have to have great racing pedigree to be a truly good car as it were.
Most racing equivalents are substantially different to there road going counter parts anyhow.