Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
As far as what people have said, it takes a few tanks to ge the ECU running on a particular RON.
Switching back and forth isn't going to help matters, it seems.
Since I rarely get to give it a bootful, I've noticed V-power giving better running and higher MPGs. There just isn't as much...
fair enough, maybe it just psychological.
It honestly does feel quite a lot limper though.
EDIT: Thanks Danny, maybe that's what I'm noticing then, as mentioned it's run on an almost exclusive diet of V-Power so it's not used to the thinner stuff.
Phew, glad it#s not just me.
Yeah, the Clio gets fed V-Power every time it can be, just this time I had the reserve light come on around duxford and allI could find was a Texaco (or something like that) with no 98's for sale.
No doubt the ECU will make up for the lack of Ron over time, but I'm...
Nope, completely boggo standard.
It was weird, suddenly you had to really pedal up through the revsa just to get it to move with any conviction. Sure it could get down the road still but there was even less low-end shove than nortmal.
I'm not saying I'm some super driver that notices 1hp or...
For the first time in months I got stuffed into putting normal unleaded into the 172.
I know it's not just me "thinking" it, but now the car is completely gutless, all the way around the dial and has dropped a load of MPG's.
Won't be doing that again in a hurry.... Does the ECU finally recover...
It's called Fallout :)
Seriously though, there isa Fallout MMORPG in the pipeline, but has been for years. It'll be closer to Wasteland than the recent FO games
Lower tax, insurance, and more MPG's though.
Service intervals at least the same as a petrol, as much to go wrong as modern low-cubed, boosted motors, so where's the negative?
Aside from a lack of revs and duff noise.
JUst get FNV then, newer of the titles.
Story is less clear-cut (who is good? who is evil? Do you care? I wonder if a Fat man can take out everyone in that camp in one go?).
The map may be a little smaller (it looks so anyway) but it's pretty well packed and, aside from the Enclave (who, like...
If you've done neither, do FNV.
The core game is bigger than FO3 and there's more to get your teeth into. It can be less buggy on some systems too, although my PS3 spits the dummy on a regular basis
3 was easier to get interested in, the straight fight of "good" -v- "evil", and the DLC's all added something else.
FNV is ok, it's more fleshed out, but I dont care about who controls vegas, especially since you dont get to see the results first hand.
A replay needs to be done so I can...
the characters in it are brilliant.
there are a lot of "special" enemies too, souped-up versions of what you might have seen before which are much harder. Well, would be if I wasn't now Level 44 anyway.
When the final DLC comes out I reckon I'll do a full restart, this time not in hardcore. ON...
the boomers? They're handy if you're playing as a good guy.
As for Honest Hearts, it's not bad. Better thena Dead Money, but Old World Blues is the best bit of all the New-style Fallout games.
only 1 year in it (182 goes out in 2006, VXR comes in 2007)
As for Beiing the best hot hatch foreverever, well, maybe, but that still means you need an audience who care.
Which is shrinking. Driving with any sort of entheusiam just leads to points, bans or barrel-rolling situations*
*...
not in the slightest, I'm in Laaaaaaahndon.
But Parents are near Ely, could make it part of a visit to the homeland.
Hell, may even blag the missus into filling a seat.