Search results

hows the cup?

i would say that imo the williams 2 is less of a williams than a 3

;)

go for it,,if i didnt go for the williams it would have to be the 172 cup,but i just thought westys 182 in classifieds was a bit tempting,,,ahhhh decisions

yeah i had a williams 2 for a little,loved it,sold it,regreted it lol,but never a 172/182 cup,i was looking for some valued opinions as to the differences/preferences between oldish and modern,,i really appreciate the constructive comments guys

i suppose in all honesty im just after something i can go for a chilled out cruise in on the weekend,i dont mind dodgy abs,,lol

ok maybe not iconic lol,but sought after;)

werent the williams 3 more disirable though as less were produced?

cheers jamie,,,nice valued opinion,,,id love a clio 172 cup,but its not gong to be used everyday which is why im leaning towards the williams i suppose in time the 172 cup will become as iconic as the williams,

wrong colour???:S

no the guy im buying it from has bought a trophy,im buying the willy of him,,,

its not a rotter,,its just had 3.5k spent on the body and engine,,,

lol,my mind is 90% made up leaning towards the williams,its not gonna be a daily driver so from a depreciation facrtor it has to be il post a pic up in a min

silly question as they are almost worlds apart but im looking for general opinions,, iv been offered an immaculate willy 3 104k fsh wanted for nothing price 2.5k im also toying wth buying a 182 85k cup packs etc 3900? i just cant deciede,,,what do you guys reckon:S

hi,upgraded from a r5 gt turbo-clio williams 2- to the cup not sure what to expect from the cup but iv heard and read nothing but good reports so we will see,,,cant wait:cool:

Hi everyone my names Adam im in exeter and ok so im excited about this one, iv just bought my first 172 cup from a main dealer,its a 2 owner 53k fsh 52 plate, its the deal of the decade i think,it had just been reduced from 4999 to 3999 iv managed to buy it for 3400 with new cambelt/service/new...

no more deeper than for 172 whats that comment based on?