0-60

[peter182]

Wots 0-60 in a 172 cup

 

[msa197]

Look at the homepage for specs.

 

[Dansta]

fookin slow. bout 8seconds....

 

[peter182]

some sites are saying 6.9 others are saying 6.5

 

[Dansta]

thats just wishful thinkin ...
they are no quicker than valvers to 60. put a good driver in a valver and your laughin.

 

[jph172]

0-60 is about 6.8. id agree with that

 

[Mike@Rentech]

Cups are slow, lol

<<<<<<<<

 

[aaronc]

In dry conditions: 6.3-6.8s

 

[paul g]

my bro time me on his phone at 6.8 not 100% i know but can,t be too far off

 

[jph172]

Perhaps im just one of the lucky ones who thinks my car is quite imprssive on a 0-60run?


Santa pod soon i think

 

[peter182]

cheers peeps

 

[lawrence]

depends on weather conditions, 6.3-7s, doubt a valver could keep up, no matter how good a driver, williams yeah not a valver,

 

[CUPPER]

i dont even think a williams could keep up to be honest. there a fair age now and book time is about 7.3 but i wish i had the experience of driving a willy, theres a nice one round my way...sounds sooo nice when it go past my house

 

[Chili Red]

The specs on the front page have the 182 slower 0-60 than the 172...

 

[stevoversteer]

0-100 is far more useful

 

[jph172]

Quote: Originally posted by CUPPER on 12 June 2005
i dont even think a williams could keep up to be honest. there a fair age now and book time is about 7.3 but i wish i had the experience of driving a willy, theres a nice one round my way...sounds sooo nice when it go past my house



Try having a go with Ballcrusher in his williams??
Me&Lawrence were both left behind when his about

 

[peter182]

is his williams modded

 

[daviebroon]

Quote: Originally posted by stevoversteer on 12 June 2005

0-100 is far more useful

Agreed... 17.1sec to 100mph for the 172 cup is the fastest clio i think (bar v6).

 

[Rousey]

does anyone know the 0-100 for the 182?

 

[Ben j]

31 secs

 

[dedman]

at the fcs i recorded a time of 6.61 secs 0-60 on the track. not bad in my standard cup!

 

[daviebroon]

Quote: Originally posted by dedman on 12 June 2005

at the fcs i recorded a time of 6.61 secs 0-60 on the track. not bad in my standard cup!

Ive timed it over and over again at what my 0-60 is... and keep getting it at around the 6.5 mark. (However not proper timing gear). No one seems to think this is genuine though.. as the book says around 7+... so that must be right(!).

I think this is a case of some cups are faster than others, and of course comes down to how good the driver is at standing starts. Ive had no problem at all leaving s2000s behind... but struggled with fookin rover coupes lol. Havent been beaten yet though! (however only had it for a few months... plenty of time to get beaten by faster motors)

 

[lawrence]

Quote: Originally posted by smoothed clio on 12 June 2005


is his williams modded

yep and so are our cup and 172, its mental mate, even standard willys have no trouble keeping up even at silly speeds, just because it says 7.3 to 60 for a willy and a cup is 6.5, in real world its nothing at all

 

[Dan_mk1]

Quote: Originally posted by lawrence on 11 June 2005
depends on weather conditions, 6.3-7s, doubt a valver could keep up, no matter how good a driver, williams yeah not a valver,


Wanna bet

 

[bonza172]

bout 6.5 on average id say n no valver cudnt match it but as peeps say i reckon a williams wud give it a go

 

[ukaskew]

Official is 6.8 I think but I have loads of literature and reviews from the Cups release and most had it tested doing 6.5. Suprisingly few cars can touch that sort of performance, especially at anywhere near the price of the Cup.

A 182 would be technically slower wouldnt it MetallicBlack? I had always assumed the weight difference pretty much cancelled out the extra 10bhp, especially considering with the 182 the Cup version isnt actually any quicker in the real world as it hasnt shed nearly as much weight as the original Cup.

Either way they are all bloody quick!

 

[Neil82]

Standard Cup is about 6.5 to 60, mine is high 5s I rekon.

 

[gazcaddy]

0-100 for 182 ic 17.0 (Autocar) 17.5 (EVO)

0-100 172 cup 16.9 (Autocar) 17.7 (EVO)

Nothing in it






[Edited by gazcaddy on 13 June 2005 at 12:52pm]

 

[blink172]

Std 172 can get 6.6 to 7.05 with a gtech. So id imagine cups are looking at 6.3-6-8s.

6.9 and 7.1s are to 62 if im not mistaken

 

[Clewsy]

I agree with ukaskew, anything sub 6 seconds is fast for a road car. Im mean, how oftern do you get to test that out? (apart from a track obviously).

As long as a car has the power to get you out of trouble when and where needed do numbers and figures really matter that much? Maybe its just me.

0-60 is dependant on far too many factors to argue about anyway, such as mods, weight, driver skill, how many passengers, tyre pressures....

The list goes on!!

 

[Chris n nic]

I got 5.8 0-60 with rsport and exhaust/decat std airbox and dodgy tires. I reckon I could knock a little more off tho

Chris

 

[badinvincible]

Quote: Originally posted by stevoversteer on 12 June 2005

0-100 is far more useful

I was going to say 30 - 100MPH is more useful.

 

[Dave H]

The Cup is one of the fastest cars ever made so l would say about 4.5 secs to 60......

 

[daviebroon]

Quote: Originally posted by gazcaddy on 13 June 2005


0-100 for 182 ic 17.0 (Autocar) 17.5 (EVO)

0-100 172 cup 16.9 (Autocar) 17.7 (EVO)

Nothing in it




[Edited by gazcaddy on 13 June 2005 at 12:52pm]

.... I dont think thats correct. Maybe im wrong, but i thought the 182 was a second or two slower to 100 from 0.

 

[JayGTT]

Mk1 172s are the fastest lol

 

[Subway]

they are still timing mine

 

[Clarkie172]

Quote: Originally posted by JayGTT on 13 June 2005

Mk1 172s are the fastest lol

haha

 

[lawrence]

Quote: Originally posted by Clarkie172 on 13 June 2005

Quote: Originally posted by JayGTT on 13 June 2005

Mk1 172s are the fastest lol

haha

i agree