ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

Camber



  172
If it's for performance, then looks don't matter.

If it's for looks, then lets be honest 1.5 degrees (standard CS.net "fast road" recommendation for a 182/172 at least) really isn't going to get noticed.

If you're going mega camber for the whole "my car is hard to steer, gets through tyres quicker than petrol, looks stupid, can't go over speedbumps and to top it off is very slow around a track due to too much camber" look then to be honest, you're not going to get anywhere with a standard ride height/standard arch gap.



EDIT: FFS misread. From a side-on view it'll be impossible to spot the camber, therefore it can't look stupid. From the front/rear view it'll just look like a car with a bit more camber than average.
 
Last edited:
  Ph2 Meg 225
I just thought with a standard height it wouldnt look right. My main priority is to lower but have always liked the camber look ( not too much though ) As I think it has a nicer stance. I may leave it till I have some coilovers ;)
 


Top