ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
Canon 100-400mm
- Thread starter SirSimon
- Start date
A red missile
Won't work on a D90 mate, but for the Nikons they do a similar type of stabilising lens - just with a differnet name.
http://www.bristolcameras.co.uk/p-nikon-80-400mm-vr-lens.htm
Whether it's as good/better/toilet I have no idea being a Canon head - but i'll lay you good odds that it's a cracker, cheaper than the Canon as well.
http://www.bristolcameras.co.uk/p-nikon-80-400mm-vr-lens.htm
Whether it's as good/better/toilet I have no idea being a Canon head - but i'll lay you good odds that it's a cracker, cheaper than the Canon as well.
Focus TDCi
The 100-400mm is one of Canon's older lenses tbh, it's a great piece of kit but most people are expecting it to be updated soon.
The push-pull zoom is known for sucking in dust and due to its age the AF isn't the quickest. I'd probably give one serious consideration if I was looking for a longer zoom though.
Find it a little strange that you're looking to put a Canon lens on a Nikon body tbh! I know Nikon's lens range is a little lacking, but without knowing much about their range I would still have thought there would be a more suitable alternative.
The push-pull zoom is known for sucking in dust and due to its age the AF isn't the quickest. I'd probably give one serious consideration if I was looking for a longer zoom though.
Find it a little strange that you're looking to put a Canon lens on a Nikon body tbh! I know Nikon's lens range is a little lacking, but without knowing much about their range I would still have thought there would be a more suitable alternative.
nope, mainly cause its a canon lens lol
you can't fit canon EF lenses on a nikon body due to physical attributes of the lens mount. you can fit Nikon lenses via an adaptor on to a canon though.
Oil Burner
really......
I would tend to disagree
But then my usual subject doesn't work very well with IS/OS/VR
A red missile
These were handheld at 400mm with the 100-400
IS ftw
IS ftw
I feared that! Oh well, it is just one of those things that would be too good to be true and would ruin the market if it was good
It seems to be popular amongst people who are in sandy environments and don't want to keep changing lenses much apparently :S
But as you said at 2kg, fook dat! Maybe if they made a titanium one with a f2.8 aperture
Oil Burner
I have to say i didn't find the 28-300 particularly heavy when i tried one. It wasn't light, but only as bad as a lot of pro lenses. Ironically the lens was rubbish though, soft as anything, but clearly faulty.
Any Canon Push-pull lens should be kept well away from any dust, they are renowned for sucking up dust.
Any Canon Push-pull lens should be kept well away from any dust, they are renowned for sucking up dust.
You're a wise man
I need to get rid of my bodies first before I buy anymore lenses
Just got a 10-22mm which is pretty sweet though
Similar threads
