what?Quote: Originally posted by badinvincible on 07 December 2004
This months issue is a good one. Guess what wins car of the year?
Somebody wrote in and said this to the mag,it turns out they picked the 2 cars to test because they were so close but couldnt include the raw CS car as there was only 200 built and it didnt seem fair to offer a car as car of the year that knowbody could drive or even see in there lifetimeQuote: Originally posted by Timbob on 08 December 2004
Did you see the copy with the GT3 RS vs the 360 CS????
Essentially they said the CS was a superior car.
A copy or 2 later it was the car of the year or something to that effect edition.
The CS was no where to be seen yet the porker gt3 rs was in there.
Contradictory!
I agree, but its because the reviews on the Top Gear programme are very well done, much better than Fourth Gear or whatever.Quote: Originally posted by ian 172 on 08 December 2004
The photography in top gear is cack and looks like they have hired a bunch of students to do it