Renault will have to provide evidence to the court,that the letter was delivered..all recorded deliveries are recorded..that is were you may have them.... also states on the letter,the catch has to be checked in the mot.(also states, the responsibly to make sure the catch is ok is the owners job)so if it passed an mot..means the catch was fine,so its a design fail isnt it?.. the case lies on the letter.... if he didn't receive one.. if the owner doesn't no about the fault. how can he check it.. the car had mots since 2008, has not mentioned there is a fault. did the mot center didn't do their job and checked it, as Renault states they should do?.. you have a claim against the mot station,they passed a car that wasn't safe.didnt they? ... you have proof from the mots from 2008 that the catch was ok(look at past mots on line) we all know mots dont check bonnet catches..do they? so you use what Renault have stated in the letter against them..i would settle out of court for a new clio sport ,after i checked the bonnet catch 1st.. ha
i will take on his case for a fee.. ha ha..
Renault could settle out of court, they wouldnt have to admit liability and get 1000s of claims against them.. costing them millions..