Im in France for a few days working and my hire cars a Clio 1.5 DCi
Since I got my 172 last month, Ive been a bit disappointed as it doesnt seem as fast as I think it should be. Anyway, after driving a normal Clio, I cant wait to get home. What a difference.
First thing I noticed was how bouncy the standard suspension was. Its like driving a kangaroo compared to the 172!! And the brakes are terrible. I know this could be the fact its a hire car and been thrashed but its only done 3500km so surely they cant be totally destroyed yet?
I quite like the engine in low revs though, it seems to be quite nippy up till 2500 revs. And the steerings really light though maybe my 17s dont help that!!
Anyway, point of the post was to say that Im quite impressed by the lower spec Clio, good around the city in traffic and it hardlyt needs any fuel. But, and this is the best bit, I cant wait to get home and give my 172 a thrash down the autobahn now I appreciate it a bit more!!
Anyone else had the chance to compare there car like this? Its given me a new appreciation for what Ive got.