ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

RB > GW 200



So after detailing Sargara's 200 today, I thought it would be rude not to get a few pics of our 200's together.
I feel that the evidence is now there to prove that RB is a greater colour than GW.
(Certainly less of a ballache to detail anyway ;) )

5790590386_7ff57142f9_z.jpg

2/6/11 Sargara 200 Detail and Shoot by Harpham y0, on Flickr

5790591794_f407e55976_z.jpg

2/6/11 Sargara 200 Detail and Shoot by Harpham y0, on Flickr

5790593438_ebbc79b3c4_z.jpg

2/6/11 Sargara 200 Detail and Shoot by Harpham y0, on Flickr

5790594526_d31f88c57c_z.jpg

2/6/11 Sargara 200 Detail and Shoot by Harpham y0, on Flickr

5790038459_288e797ed7_z.jpg

2/6/11 Sargara 200 Detail and Shoot by Harpham y0, on Flickr

5790039621_944a5d37bd_z.jpg

2/6/11 Sargara 200 Detail and Shoot by Harpham y0, on Flickr

:rasp:

For any of you detailing whores that are interested, here is the thread: http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?582808-2x-Clio-200-Details
 
  MK3, RX450H.
Both need to have a little bit more lows.
Oof, harsh! :)
But no, I do prefer the colour of the RB by far.
Quality cars overall.
 
http://img805.imageshack.us/img805/3760/img20110602152341.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
Check out my awesome sunburnt lobster arms lol.
[quote="Crippin, post: 7772390"]Both need to have a little bit more lows.
Oof, harsh! :)
But no, I do prefer the colour of the RB by far.
Quality cars overall.[/QUOTE]
This man knows what he's on about RB > GW.
Defo needs moar lowz though!
 
Bought my 200 from Richard1 too, i couldn't decide between GW and RB.

Both look fantastic, had a RB182 so went for GW in the end.
 


Top