Secondly CFD is something I work with on a daily basis - small simple example:
Simulating the V6 airbox is something that I have not considered but I will do. We saw the physical results on the pressure drop between the standard airbox & the V6 using the map load data, I will simulate it and compare the theoretical pressure differences with the recorded - will that satisfy you
Tom what CFD package are you using? (not relevant to this thread just trying to find a good one for uni)
^ i'd also like to know this please
I think maybe it's just for turbo VAG cars. They swear that it improves throttle response...
Its all in their heads!! If u do something ur going to be convinced in ur own head its better!
Solidworks in that case, but also implement ANSYS software, Pro-engineer & a CFdesign plugin.
Problem is there are so many contradictions. Sure, on the road - but people need results, figures, graphs before committing to a product. Telling them it 'feels' good is just no good.
Secondly CFD is something I work with on a daily basis - small simple example:
Simulating the V6 airbox is something that I have not considered but I will do. We saw the physical results on the pressure drop between the standard airbox & the V6 using the map load data, I will simulate it and compare the theoretical pressure differences with the recorded - will that satisfy you
Forget the smoothening of the square...
V6 box mounted like this; i've tried a lot of things down the induction route but this is a winner!! costs were a laugh too