V6 Rep

[mullen]

Seen this on pistonheads, doesn't look too bad, seen worse

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1066236.htm

 

[5parky]

Been posted before, but yeah looks alright. I hate cars that are all show and no go though. You have to be retarded to get a 1.4 "v6"

 

[Struggler]

looks gash,

poverty rear spoiler,
no front fogs
mesh grill,
sitting faar to high at the front,
and the wings dont line up with the bonnet,

and why on earth have they made a mk1 v6, from ma mk2 ph2??

not something id be looking twice at tbh

 

[mx1_champ]

looks gash,

poverty rear spoiler,
no front fogs
mesh grill,
sitting faar to high at the front,
and the wings dont line up with the bonnet,

and why on earth have they made a mk1 v6, from ma mk2 ph2??

not something id be looking twice at tbh[/quo
ithink it is a phase one as it has the p1 rear boot release on it , instead of the reno badge style release . but agreed on the rest

 

[Struggler]

well its got the ph2 areal position, thats what made me believe its a ph2, no ph1s ever had that and it would be a b**ch to change them,

tbh, i think its fishy, put ph2 lights on the rear, but not the ph2 bootlid

it was what i believe is a ph2, with a ph1 front and boot lid,

and did the ph2 1.4 16v's ever come with the basic of basic spoilers thats fitted to this model??

looks fish imo

 

[cat171]

I think to make it more realistic they fitted a phase 1 front end to it, the bit about the boot is a bit hit & miss tbh, some mk1 vee's have a phase 1 boot on them, others have a phase 2 item. I think they probably changed that too.

For the 10k they claim to have spent they could have just got a mk1 though !