ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

who do you trust?



  Clio 172mk2
the sat navs better for the average read out, but personally i wouldnt go off it for speed limits near cameras, better to be safe then sorry
 
  silver valver/hybrid
on the toyota van i use for work, anything over 40mph reads 8mph higher on the speedo than it does on my tom tom, and my origin b2 which both show identical speeds
 
mine seems to be anything upto 5mph out. its worse at slower speeds, which is odd considering the faster you go the more a variance is likely to me magnified.
 
Neither.
Sat nav only works on the straight to be totally accurate the speedo about 5mph out so I just worked out what the true speed is by knokcing 5mph off the clock speeds.
After checking though the affects of tyre wear on the speedo (after all a smaller wheel near the limits doesn't travel as far per rpm as a new tyre) I'm not worried about it being out as I couldn't find any real difference.
 
  RS 200
My Origin B2 and Pioneer AVIC-X1 Sat Nav both read 4mph slower than the Speedo, but use the speedo anyway when going through speed traps just to make sure I'm not gonna get stung.

Chris
 
  None
I do bit of both even tho my speedo is pretty damn accurate compared to my gps - almost nothing in it sometimes at higher speeds
 
  182
sat nav but i always go off the speedo with speed cameras as its about 3mph slower than the sat nav says.
 


Top