in red it looks acceptable for some reason.
Still cant get over how ugly the full car is though, my GT is bad enough.
Have you honestly seen one in the flesh or just pictures? I parked next to a GT the other day in a multistory car park and the 200 looked 200 times better . Its still one of them cars you have to see on the move or in the flesh, it just doesnt photo well from cetain angles (mainly the front).
I dont know how you could live with it other than the power and handling. f**king ugly as sin.
That has to be one of the stupidest things i think i have ever read on my forum. :lolup:
Not even gonna explain how i bring myself to live with it, but its hard pfft!
Paul
It was stupid because you have purchased a GT. I dont care if you would buy one or not but people in glass houses dont chuck stones. At least the 200 has something going for it.
Paul
200's are f**king ugly. GT's are f**king ugly. FFS you're arguing over which fat bint you'd rather ravage. In an ideal world, neither!!
200's are f**king ugly. GT's are f**king ugly. FFS you're arguing over which fat bint you'd rather ravage. In an ideal world, neither!!
True but one of these fat b**chies gives one of the best hand and BJ in the world for the price and its not the GT!!!
Paul
But back to your original comment.
I dont know how you could live with it other than the power and handling. f**king ugly as sin.
So ask yourself the same question thats all im getting at. I have never said the 200 was pretty or amazing look at. I have always agreed it ugly from the front end. I was just pointing out that your question was stupid.
200 has no looks but good handling and proformance according to you.
So what does the GT have going for it? and how do you live with it??? because it has no handling or proformance and the full econemy on petrol is lame.
Now you must see why that was a stupid comment for you to say.
Paul
No problem bud, reading back, it was totally pointless and didnt say what i wanted to say lol. Still a f**k ugly car though.