Rstuner consumption, better or worse

[Ezra-RS]

Let's have a central thread for this.

Maps from fastchip; for better or for worse?

This may vary because there isn't a foolproof way of testing (expect cc) but let's try anyway:
Did your consumption go up or down after remapping?

 

[Ralphizzle]

Stayed the same... remapped in upper regions for more fuel flow when you need it!

 

[st3ve]

It's only the overrun map which consumes more fuel.

 

[Ezra-RS]

Yeah I thought so. About how much more does it consume to make the pops and bangs?

 

[st3ve]

Yeah I thought so. About how much more does it consume to make the pops and bangs?

It's difficult to put an exact figure on it but you will use a fair bit more. It'll be more noticeable on long journeys.

 

[Ezra-RS]

And that's just because there's the bangs added? Because a part from that I guess it's the same map as the normal stage 1 map.

 

[st3ve]

And that's just because there's the bangs added? Because a part from that I guess it's the same map as the normal stage 1 map.

Pretty much.

 

[TomEdwards]

I just drove 404 miles on the RSTuner (Norwich and back) and did average of 43.4mpg and took a whole tank. (Clio 182FF)