Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
wow strange that you are changing from the vetec to a 172... would of thought u would have went for the Civic type r or the teg type r ... If it is the mk1 clio u are looking for then you can get them for as low as £9000... u can look on www.autotrader.co.uk theres some on there for around the...
the guys gotta lotus a subaru and a clio cup and u think hes worried about having to pay for repairs ... it does look like he has been saving his pennie s !!!!
Jock
WOW .. sorry to hear about that ... Who the hell did u buy it from...would be having words personally
Did u find out (or will u) how it happened ??
Jock
the guys gotta lotus a subaru and a clio cup and u think hes worried about having to pay for repairs ... it does look like he has been saving his pennie s !!!!
Jock
WOW .. sorry to hear about that ... Who the hell did u buy it from...would be having words personally
Did u find out (or will u) how it happened ??
Jock
you can get them for 13k as well or 15k brand new .... i would easily get one .. i think they are great ...check this out:
http://www.4car.co.uk/special/videozone/main.jsp?pg=2&make=Skoda&model=Octavia%20RS
click the driveability link ... car looks amazing ..the 0-60 is around 7.9 secs. wot...
you can get them for 13k as well or 15k brand new .... i would easily get one .. i think they are great ...check this out:
http://www.4car.co.uk/special/videozone/main.jsp?pg=2&make=Skoda&model=Octavia%20RS
click the driveability link ... car looks amazing ..the 0-60 is around 7.9 secs. wot...
im pretty sure it is 15s on the mk1 clio .... i think personally that they made 172 look more grown up and less agressive with the mk2.... the mk1 defo looks more hardcore (well from the front anyway) in a way it is good that the 172 can be bought to cater for both needs .... some people prefer...
im pretty sure it is 15s on the mk1 clio .... i think personally that they made 172 look more grown up and less agressive with the mk2.... the mk1 defo looks more hardcore (well from the front anyway) in a way it is good that the 172 can be bought to cater for both needs .... some people prefer...
i am fully aware of all the mag tests between these 2.... i am also very aware of the bullsh*t they spin as well. Theres been so many contradictions i dont know what to believe ..... ive never seen or heard of someone putting a CTR Vs 172 against eachother in 0-100 sprint b4 .... This is more...
that will be good if you do that test ... ive always wanted to talk to someone who has raced a CTR Vs 172..... my assumption is that to 60mph it will be pretty similar ..then around 70mph the CTR will start to pull away... when r u going to do the test????
Jock
i am fully aware of all the mag tests between these 2.... i am also very aware of the bullsh*t they spin as well. Theres been so many contradictions i dont know what to believe ..... ive never seen or heard of someone putting a CTR Vs 172 against eachother in 0-100 sprint b4 .... This is more...
that will be good if you do that test ... ive always wanted to talk to someone who has raced a CTR Vs 172..... my assumption is that to 60mph it will be pretty similar ..then around 70mph the CTR will start to pull away... when r u going to do the test????
Jock
i know u have no reason to lie about the results ... u dont own a mk2 172. Do u ?? its just when u hear and read reviews where proffessional race car drivers have driven cars and get 0-60 times of 7.2 etc.... u start to believe that. Then when someone comes along and says they beat that by...
i know u have no reason to lie about the results ... u dont own a mk2 172. Do u ?? its just when u hear and read reviews where proffessional race car drivers have driven cars and get 0-60 times of 7.2 etc.... u start to believe that. Then when someone comes along and says they beat that by...