Search results

Looks very cute.

I find anything above 30 too high. I like a bit of 28f 27r.

Is Ford Championship White pearlescent? Thats what it is getting done in anyway.

1.2 dynamique - BN02 UPX - worst car in the world. Was a Cat D, airbags all deployed, Stevie Wonder stitched up the seats, returned 25mpg when driving it nicely, had 4 PAGES of faults when plugged into Renaults Diagnostics, misfired, clutch slipped so bad it wouldn't ever wheel spin and the on...

And he got it off Middo mate. There are loads in the breakers yards, as the meggys are that little bit older.

I am sure Edde will be along soon enough. He explained it to me initially and undoubtedly he will be able to give a better explanation.

Why do you wish to fit fogs :S?

Must be a cup in disguise.

Well its cheap in relation to a 2.0 engine... Ok, fair play, I would still say lowering springs though. Just remember buy everything second hand - you won't lose much, if any, money this way.

I would say lowering and Renault alloys.

Welcome mate :) You might find alot of people advise against bodykits etc. Most favour bolt on mods, this was you want lose so much money and in many peoples eyes, will look better. Sam

150ish.

They would look good, but ideally you would want 10mm spacers to correct the difference in offset.

As stated above. Why would hit peak power and then hit another gear, getting further out the power band? The aim: To get the highest average power from the gear. You need to look at a RR graph OP, work out the length of the gear and then work out where you should be changing into and out of...

Deffo easier to swap wheels. And cheaper. Yeah, the rationale behind it is - more grip at the back, so more chance of the front staying in front of the back.

Edde swears by putting the best tyres on the front. By that I don't think you are supposed to change the tyres over alone, just change the wheels over with the tyres on. Sam

Change at 6k. Although IIRC it should be a little lower in 1st, I think to protect the engine.

IMO, if you like to drive it hard and enjoy keeping it at high revs go for a 1.2. If you prefer taking it a little slower take the DCI. I would go for the 1.2.

They should drop about 10mm or so in the next few weeks matey.

A friend of mine used to have looking ones. They were stolen and the also ruined the valve too!

lol @ some of the above posts. With regards to your speedo: It is all about the rolling radius of the tyre, not the alloy. Providing you drop the size of the tyre wall (profile percentage x width) as you increase the alloy size you will have no problems with the speedo or the gearing being...

Your speedo will not be out providing you stick to the original tyres.

5999 for 172 with a view to accept no less than 5900. 7999 for 182 with a view to accepting no less than 7600. Sam

Ok excellent, so they come with wheels in the auction then?

Did you manage to get spigots to fit clio bore?

As above, why do you think it is Cat C? If it is Cat C then it will need a VIC check and another MOT. From how you have described, I'd have thought it is a Cat D. If this is the case keep it going as per usual, but do seek legal advice to ensure it is legally yours. If it is CAT C or D...

I think gloss black 182 alloys could look good on yours Chris. Or even better, gloss black superleggeras? Sam

I cannot see the advantages of 17s myself: Make clios look like tractors, ruin the ride, ruin the handling, tyres cost a bomb, increase the likely hood of rubbing, slow acceleration (especially on something like a 1.2) and to top it all off are much easier to buckle/crack/bend. Based on the...

More importantly it isn't such a fun chuckable car. That is what would be putting me off a clio3 as opposed to a clio2. Sam

Is that the rep that was on eBay? I thought it sold? Sam