Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Don't think there were any doubts it was going drive brilliantly. That's what Renaultsport do.
But the looks are terrible. I'd say it's uglier than a ph1 172.
I don't even know I'm doing it most of the time :o
My mate always has me about it... "Does you leaning forward improve the aerodynamics? Or is it more weight over the front end for better traction?" lol cnut :(
My reasoning in the Clio is that if I don't lean forward when gunning it, I miss...
In your opinion Dan ;)
Makes me laugh that people who own the iPhone say "It's a phone, not a f**king camera" in repsonse to the fact the iPhone camera is about 10 years behind most new phones.
So if it's just a phone.... Why do iPhone owners get so wet about 1 million pointless apps like a...
Well I'm undoubtedly the exception to that rule.
Had no trouble in 2.5 years on Sky's Mid Package (8Mb).
Ping is 26ms and get 6.8Mb without slowdown or interruption. Can't fault it for £5 pcm!!
Williams. V6 is an epic car, but relative performance is pretty poor.
And what's with the Saab being no 2? A car having a hatchback doesn't make it a hot hatch - Affordability is a big part of it imho.
Cruise added as standard from July (ish) 2003. Was NEVER a cost option.
ESP added July 2002. Was NEVER a cost option, but I believe wasn't always switchable.
172 production ceased December 2003. Anything on a 2004 plate was simply late-registered.
LOL. Even Yoz doesn't know either. He should know better!
You find me a 172 earleier than july 2003 with Cruise control and I'll eat my hat.
I know this because that was when I bought mine. It DIDN'T have cruise specced in the list when I ordered it. I waited several months for it to be...