Search results

I'd have thought something like this would be better?

Nice thread, interesting you take the pictures of the mileage whilst driving lol

The 172 is over priced, looks like hes trying to re-coup the respray costs. It does look amazing though, but as others have said I would imagine in todays market where that silver 182FF went for 5.5k on other thread (http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?t=347184) hes not going to get...

You should have test driven a few before you bought it.

189 you can tell as the rear spoiler isn't colour coded.

Whats the camera? Great pictures.

Sorted yet? I'm still getting this website is unsafe

Most people are holding onto any savings I'd have thought at the moment.

What version are you using?

You'll get back 8 months work minus a small fee if you paid in full amount at the start.

I do like the look of the 3 series, but a bit of a family car?

Whats the SatNav like anyway? Most incar stuff doesn't seem to be a patch on things like TomTom. Agreed though it increases resale.

Spot on!

Tinting the front screen just reduces the drivers visibility and to me it sounds plain stupid. No idea how you'd see out with 50% less light, so no wonder the police and insurance companies get funny about it.

Nevermind it will be your fault for driving of the road into that tree at night because you couldn't see clearly out the front of the car :cool:

To be honest the driver would make the biggest difference

Thought I'd join up to pick up on some of the buyers guides and threads on here. I used to own a Clio 172 about 3 or 4 years ago now moved on to various different boring cars, but latterly a Lotus Elise Sport 160. Sadly as ever money and running costs meant I had to give that up after a couple...