Search results

My 182 (both cup bits) is on a 54 plate (2004) with 4k miles on it. I emailed a dealer about part exchange on a Audi S3 to see how much they would offer and they said "if the car is as new then we can give you £8,000 now i know Renault dont hold their value that well but thats a joke, i was...

And exactly what is the point of it?

about 300-350 miles to a tank, thats with optimax though the 182 holds 11 gallons of petrol and should according to Renault do 33mpg, assuming the light comes on with a gallon left then it still should do 330 miles on a tank

i prefer autocar

Im assuming you mean the clio v6 which has a 3.0 255 bhp engine where the rear seats are, it isnt called GTA though

according to autocar the 182 is about 4 secs quicker and an earlier evo test including the 182, MCS, CTR, Pug GTI and Focus ST the clio was 2.4 secs faster to 100

Yeah read that but in a previous evo test and autocar the 182 is way quicker and it should be it has more power and weighs less

im 22 and insured my 182 for £1200 with NCD

182 is about 4 secs faster to 100 than the MCS, quite a big difference considering the MCS is about 5k more expensive when specced up to the same as the 182

i assume the MINI was about 18k so you could get a focus RS, LCR, CTR, RS 225, S3 plenty of chocie out there

I have an autocar magazine with the old works 200bhp on it, it wasnt a proper road test but they did some performance figure for it MCS Works 182 0-60 6.8 6.3 0-100 17.2 17.0 30-70 5.9 5.8 Obviosuly the new one will be...

the v6 is faster than the ctr, probably about 1.5 secs faster to 100. Theres no doubting the V6 is quick but when it comes down to performance per pound then its not impressive

no one is giving you a hard time, the facts are that the 182 and CTR are similar in performance. Sometimes one feels quicker but this is sometimes to do with the way the power is delivered. For example my brother has a BMW 330ci and we both agree that the 182 feels quicker (this is probably due...

in most mags the 182 is faster to 60 than the CTR and the CTR faster to 100. I doubt the CTR can get to 60 in 6.4 as it requires two gear changes, most mags get it to 60 in late 6s

sounds like there is something wrong with your 182 mate, cos there is nothing in it between the 182 and CTR, until silly speeds

I thought the 182 does the 1/4 run in about 15 secs

surely the figures dont lie, 17.5 in evo and 17 in autocar, i assumed they would do it with just the driver in the car and a small amount of fuel (i assume this is the same for all cars), what do you reckon the 182 will do it in then??

I dont like the look of the civic and i cant see (other than the extra space) why the civic is 3k more

I think it is quite difficult to tell which is the fastest even if you have owned them both, the way the power is delivered make cars feel faster, cars with turbos always feel faster

in autocar 0-60 0-100 30-70 182 6.3 17.0 5.8 WRX 5.5 16.1 5.8 Pretty close then, anway id rather have the 182 i think they are so ugly, would have a S4 M3 over a STI anyday, although I have to admit value...

autocar 182 6.3

A mate of mine at work owns a WRX (225), he claims that it will blow my 182 away, i disagree and believe that up to 100mph the clio will hang on to it, what do you guys reckon? any experiences? Also as part of my arguement i refer to an article in autocar where the 182 was faster round the...

Ive just looked on autotrader and there are six. As for the silver one of J28 of the M1 if you like it then go for it, i dont think the number of owners is that important, obviously it will slightly effect resale value but the main thing is reg and mileage.

Ar those sales in the UK? or worldwide?

CTR top speed is 146, i assume the clio 5th gear has no grunt because it geared to give good economy

never done 1/4 mile racing, i know most mags say about 15 sec for the 182, i assume about 14 for the V6 in good conditions

nothing in it (until silly speeds 100+)