Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
enjoy mate, ive ordered the same arctic blue with cup packs should be here in about 10 days. havent heard anything about arctic blue being discontinued,
Thats not true though, autocar got the 182 to 60 0.8 secs faster than the 172 and nearly a second faster to a 100, also the 182 does 30-70 through the gears in over a second faster than the 172
I think alot of people on here who have swapped a 172 for a 182 say that the 182 is slightly faster...
Just a quick point on the depreciation according to what car:
CTR costs £16,250 and will be worth £10.452 in 3 years time thats a loss of £5798
The 182 costs vary but I bought mine for £13,500 and what car says it will be worth £7263 in 3 years time and thats a loss of £6237
so theres only...
I will put Shell Optimax in my 182 when it comes, Renault reccommend 98 ron so thats what it will get.
I think most people on here would use the reccomended engine oil and would not be to please if renault put crap oil in their car, same for petrol IMO
to be honest it wouldnt matter what your username was its your comments that concern me.
in the UK the 182 cup is a 182 cup not a team. Also if you dont like the seats in the 182 dont buy one, buy somethin else
I think my comments touched a nerve with you
There are quite alot of people on here who think the williams can keep up with the 172 but the facts speak for themselves, here are some performance figures:
0-60 0-100
Clio Williams 7.7 20.8
Clio 172 7.1 17.9
The 172...
Cheers, all the mags seem to get the 182 to 60 in well under 7 secs.
What suprises me though is how much quicker it is than the GTI 180, you would have though there would be nothing in it
Those are from the road test though (not the 0-100-0) or did the 182 post the same times in the 0-100-0
The reason I ask is becuase I know the megane posted significantly different times in the 2 different tests!
I know what times 182 did on Autocars proper road test but was just wondering what times the 182 posted in the 0-100-0
Also what time did the 182 get for 0-60 and 0-100?
Anyone know?
I cant believe hes asked you to prove it!!!
By the way the original thread was whether the 182 was faster than the 172 not the 172 cup
When the 182 is run in i wouldnt have though there would be much in it
The 182 and 172 cup 0-60 times (done by mags) seem to be about half a second quicker...
It goes on about the cup being raw, it is exactly the same car as the 182 (if you have cup packs) the only difference is the weight, the setup is the same
she will have no prob getting insurance, all the colours are good, i picked arctic blue but the car i test drove was silver and that looked nice, also the new inferno red colour is very nice
Looks is a personal thing, but i like the looks of the 182 i think it looks sporty but not too over the top.
I think people who dont know much about cars will just think the cliosports are just standard clios.
Mitchey how come you have had so many cars in the last couple of years? do you...
I like the Cooper S, the prob with it is expensive and weighs to much so the RS clios murder them in a straight line.
the clio is over a second quicker to 60 and about 4 secs quicker to 100. The 182 according to autocar is faster than the Cooper S Works as well.
What the MINI has going for...
on the Evo website there is a road test between the 172 and ZR 160, have a guess which one wins?
not suprisingly, the 172 wins, if you read the test it disagrees with you MG boys
[Edited by gazcaddy on 20 October 2004 at 7:11pm]