Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I had a good blast with the gf in her mcs at the weekend. I was impressed but the run flats are gash! Not driven the 200 yet but it sounds good! Pity about the looks...
Yeah, mine has been great so far and like you, I never load it up off the line, so hopefully the clutch etc will last.
The MPG is up, slightly, so I can't see how it's using more fuel. So far, so good, and the performance gains are impressive!
No probs Danny. I don't really mean this, I just think the lack of abs isn't an issue. If the Cup had come with abs then people would just bang on about another weight saving feature.
I've not yet required abs and I'm certainly no driving hero but overall, I prefer the Cup and would always...
I agree but I think they just trying to keep some of the original Mini features. They are too funky for my liking but suit girls perfectly!:rasp: Quality cars but I'd always opt for the Clio.
There is sod all difference to 100. In gear, the Mini will be quicker and at the top end but we're not talking 'into the sunset' here. As with a lot of hot hatches of this variety, there is nowt in it in real world driving - the advantage lies with the better driver.
Both are cracking cars...
Very little, if any difference between them to 100, give or take a hill or passenger. Straight road, no difference on a standard 182 and MCS turbo. The torque provides a bit more in gear acceleration.
I know this too.
Sounds like a good wee test.
Four nice cars that all have different characteristics and plus points. That sounds like the Clio's environment, so I would expect it to compete pretty well against the others - power doesn't always count for much on these roads. The 106 would no doubt have been a...