Search results

"There is one more PS5, it must be destroyed also"

>160Kbps mp3. 128 Kbps aac sound more than fine to my ears. Luckily we have a 3 disc autoloader cd copier at work, I reverse-engineered the protocol on it and wrote a program to auto-load a stack of cd's and rip them in iTunes :) No user intervention required! :)

I got my 8gb nano last thursday, sound quality is much better than my 4G iPod. As for ripping, rip to 128Kbps aac, it's far better than mp3. Don't transcode your files because they'll end up sounding nasty.

I thought Apple had just stopped the education discount on the iPod? Edit: Or maybe this is just the US student discount? Different?

tuesday about 7pm UK time.

bored disco?! me too. ;) int main(void) { int tuples[6]; int i, j,k,generating=TRUE; for (i=0;i<6;i++) tuples[i] = 100; while(generating) { for (j=0,k=0;j<6;j++) k += tuples[j]; if ( (k==4095) || ((k % 65)==0)) {...

Ahh. I missed that part of his post. That sure would stop it!

oh. I've got the 8GB!

I still like that 000-000-000-000-000-000 is a valid key! ;)

disco, your mod is the wrong way round - Should be equal to zero as no remainder means it divisible by 65. edit: ignore me, just noticed your loops are while not valid.....d'oh.

No pics as I'm at work. The wheel doesn't light up, but it's pretty cool - I've got a 3rd generation mono ipod, this ones a hell of a lot sweeter! Sounds a lot better too.

got bored. compiled the code and it works. you are aware that 000-000-000-000-000-000 is a valid serial number?! lol.

stick it in code tags mate. My code you'll need a 'C' compiler, the free microsoft one will do.

I find it slightly amusing that whatever software you're writing, 2 of us have written keygens for it! lol.

Do yourself a favour (and presumably the company you work for) and ditch that method of serial number generation! Poor! It'll take you a long time to generate all possible serial numbers, that a large maximum value, 999-999-999-999-999-999 - but if you really want to do it, then something like...

The nano has arrived. Looking sweet. :)

Not in the application, the signing of the hash with the public key encryption gives a straight yes/no answer to whether the "license key" is valid. When they type in the key, a hash is generated and compared against the hash in the "license key". You'll need to store the "serial number hash"...

What information do you want the license key to hold? look up md5 hashes and RSA encryption. Basic idea is to create a hash of the license information, then use RSA or other public key encryption to sign it.

I use easynews. Can't be arsed with all this archaic NNTP nonsense!

shure e2c's!