Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Me neither....something just doesn't work for me. Looks like a nice example though.
My experience with Seat is not good. The salesman fell asleep on the test drive....doesn't say a lot for the cars! He was hungover I suspect, and hopefully now jobless after a bitter complaint and no sale - EVER!
Will I start a new thread.......?
Surely that makes it a good thread, if it's 4 months old and still going. It's amazing how people sit on this forum and get worked up about people's views when that is the whole point of the site!
Ralph Wiggum - I'm taking the pi$$! But I'm sure the...
Fast isn't just about 0-60. 0-100 is a different story, especially in a Lupo. So yes, Lupo's are not fast. I would like to see 7.7 secs to 60. 8.3 would be closer.
My mate has a T-Sport and I have spanked him many a time in it. It's such a gutless engine. Same with the Celica. The Supercharged version is slightly quicker but not any quicker than a Cup to 100mph.
They may not be accurate but it's still around 5 seconds quicker to 100mph (the 172). That's a fair difference imo.
0-100 is a better test of a car's acceleration, I think.
I've never had any probs seeing off GTi's. Not too much in it to 60, maybe a second but there after - no problem at all. Be confident and you will smoke him on a drag.