Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Dunno, but you can definetly tell the difference between Valver and Williams handling..
The rear track would help tho, altho, I dunno by how much (Valver/Williams is the same track at back just different shocks.. 1.2/1.4/Rsi is narrower track)
[Edited by Daz on 15 August 2005 at 7:45pm]
You could.. but youd definetly need wider front arches and you couldnt make the rear track wider without making the rear arches wider!
The Williams setup is pretty much completly different to the 1.8 16v setup, so youd need all Williams I think.
Its normal for a Williams 3 engine.. the pressure guages on them goes up and down like the rev counter. Dunno if Glenns was a 3 or not?
1s and 2s seem to be a bit more stable around the 3bar mark..
My Williams3 used to be 6 in the morning without fail.. then drop right down at idle when...
http://www.cliosport.net/articles/index.asp#Wilhttp://www.cliosport.net/articles/index.asp#Wil
Might be a good place..
Evo love it.. 6th Best Car of the Last Decade.. was up against Zondas, M3s, Ferraris, etc.. ;)
Quote: Originally posted by beatjunkie on 05 August 2005
my phase 3 is a pain in the a$$ its got 58mm spacing!took ages to get the correct kit!
Think Ben Ps did have as well!
Was bad enough with 52 or 54.. but then they threw 58 in!
Quote: Originally posted by T-Unit on 05 August 2005
<FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #407db6">Yeah fair comment. I still think with wheel spacers, coil overs and all the engine work hes having done there wouldnt be much in it but then if youve got more to start with youll end up with more...