Search results

Great looking car, looks better than the new one IMO

5th pics down, deffo an a3/s3, no 3 door a4's were ever made!!

You sure? Looks like an S3, can't see any rear doors and the headlights look wrong.

Common area for stone chips, may just be trying to cover them up.

I used to have these, but they're so dull in bright sunlight, went for philips from then on.

powerbulbs.com

Loving the cereal. How does it compare to the NSX?

Seeing it on thursday, high miles but looks tidy.

What are you replacing it with??

32k Miles! That's fooking expensive.

And I'm pretty sure Steve said I can have it for 4k.;)

I've already PM'd him about the maxogen, just in case;)

Have you tried autotrader? I usually get a much better response from there.

And a car of that age from Japan will usually be in far better nick than a car from here.

If you're the main driver, but put yourself down as just a named driver, it's illegal and dodgy. There was a post put up a while ago by someone who's high up at an insurers about the lengths they go to investigate in the event of a high claim. Insurance is part of the running costs. If you can't...

Sounds lovely. Sounds so much nicer than the 1*2 engine note, must put all the power into making the nice noise;)

A friend of mine dislocated his shoulder at the becks bridge after eau rouge, going round on J.Buttons moped and they were working on the bridge so he had to go on the grass. Thought it was flat out. Failed.

FTO was brought in. The Mitsubishi FTO, is a front engined, front wheel drive coupe produced by Mitsubishi Motors between 1994 and 2000. It was originally planned to be exclusively for the Japanese domestic market, although its popularity as a grey market import to the United Kingdom, Ireland...

As I've never driven one I'm not gonna argue with you. But, didn't ralliart bring a few official FTO's over?

Can't be compared. The DC2 was named best ever FWD car by Evo, ahead of the Trophy, 205, Willy etc. FTO's don't come close.

Read the performance car mag long term test. Despite being the cheapest car, it's costing the most to run with bits needing replacing etc. Great cars, but long in the tooth now.

Looks luverly

Insurance in your dad's name? If you can't afford to insure it you can't afford the car. Not exactly got a shabby car for a 20 yr old, hang onto it until you can afford to buy and run a dc2.

Absolute shitter. It's a tale of caution though, if you can't afford fully-comp, you can't afford the car. Gutted for you chap, doubt you'll get anything out of it.

Think I'm one of the few people thats had both. Sportlines look good, but pro's handle better. Ride is better, and deals better with broken tarmac at speed. I'd go for the pro's every time.

Around town, no problem. Motorways, horrendous. I don't mind my cars raw, but getting a headache after 10 mins on the motorway was getting annoying.

Had one on my 182. Sounded great, but had to take mine off. I do a lot of motorway mileage, the resonance was absolutely awful.

Better shine with autoglym aqua wax. Nice car though (except the mirrors)

No. The R26 is the best of the road megane's (and the current rsport range), the R26R will probably better on track, but like the mini gp too stiff and compromised for the road.

Regardless of how good he is at engine building (pretty irrelevant), he looks like a rich fool with too powerful a car. Cornering one handed, left hand resting on gearknob when he's not shifting. WTF? It's a race, not a drive through. Most people with limited knowledge know that shifting mid...