Search results

how could you be arsed, first puddle and its back to the way it was.

I think the 197 is the uncorrected figure, it will be 192ish

1. Philthy --------------Clio 172 --------------220/170 2. JJ -------------------Lotus Exige ----------184/145 3. Big Iain -------------Pug 106 --------------122 4. BioHzrd------------- Clio 3 1.6 -------------112/108 5. Djw John------------Clio 172 --------------162/141 6...

yeap not bad, GDI did the conversion. Its got cams, flowed head etc too so would have liked more but not displeased at all considering the other figures!

twas indeed, some car that one, owners a legend too :D haha that teg sounded like it was running out of steam just before the vtec piped up.

1. Philthy --------------Clio 172 --------------220/170 2. JJ -------------------Lotus Exige ----------184/145 3. Big Iain -------------Pug 106 --------------122 4. BioHzrd------------- Clio 3 1.6 -------------112/108 5. Djw John------------Clio 172 --------------162/141 6...

Im running ET35 on 7x16" so it will be fine. oh laura the police disliked the carbon plates as much as you so they are back to normal now :D

no no 220lbft, I knew it was about that just didnt know the bhp figure

some reason I cant edit more than 30 mins after I strated the thread... mmm thats useful. can a moderator lift that on this thread?

Please PM me with your results so I can update the list! NAME----------------CAR----------------bhp/torque 1. Philthy --------------Clio 172 --------------220/170 2. JJ -------------------Lotus Exige ----------184/145 3. Big Iain -------------Pug 106 -------------- 4. BioHzrd-------------...

edit, started a new thread here> http://www.cliosport.net/forum/showthread.php?p=3715396#post3715396 PM me you results.

yea did have to boost early. I got one too, il upload it tomo from my phone

why does my car always avoid the cameras lol good pics mate

Im loving them, mpg is about 36 on a good motorway run and about 10 when giving it some. If its not about that then it aint mapped very well. only thing I would change is the radiator, need a lower one. Or maybe higher profile cams and solid lifters.

only one ive seen was at the side of the M74 with a blowout, i like!

the camber isnt quite as extreme, just the camera has distorted it a bit.

yeap, they came off my car. only pics I can get are at night cause its always so feckin dark this time of year

I fitted KW variant 1s last night and dropped it a bit, the front sits about 40mm off the tarmac, handles brilliant now.

not a bad call mate, did think of one myself but not all that cheap to run. great RWD handling though

its not a sleeper its gay. laura, il take that as a compliment :P

Id rather gnaw my left arm off than drive a jeep

36.6mpg on mways, 28 combined i reckon so far. Easily as good as standard but ov a lot worse giving it the beans. the insurance is still half what I was paying on the evo, prob not far off as quick I dont think either

I said cheap to run scoobies do 20mpg and cost a fortune to insure.. and m3s are the same, my dads crank bearings went on his m coupe (same engine, common fault) last week and cost 1200 for a new crank plus 2000 for a rebuild... any others you can think of? Id quite happily give you a...

I had polk audio components and infinty rears, the rear set up is gash for sound quality though, a metal box going into the engine bay!

eh? tell me a faster car that I can get for 7k all in and is as cheap to run and handles as well.

yup tis mine, andys giving it some on the rollers

lol ^

was going to say! suppose first time round will always take ages

yeap thats the one looked pretty young when I saw him tbh

super 1600 shell, 2.0 engine more pics here http://www.smdracing.co.uk/gallery.php